Fuji is about to announce a new half-frame fusion camera; the leaked image is trending on Webio. This is an exciting time since Fuji is always trying to create a new consumer base with its new offerings. The image is very unique and interesting, the design of the camera resembles the PENTAX 17 or Leica M.
This is the first time the leaked image of the upcoming camera surfaced on the web, as in the image we can see the lens is a fixed Fujinon lens, EBC coating, large aperture of F2.4. The focal length parameters are not known and the photo has been pixelated by the source. Take a look at what the source said
According to sources, testing has begun with some cameramen. If this leak is true, this look will certainly appeal to certain market segments, so we look forward to more definitive news.
It’s an interesting design to have the shutter button in the center of the exposure dial. It’s compact, but it seems to have some sort of optical viewfinder.
Fuji Half-Frame Camera Specification
Half Frame camera
Dimensions: 105.8mm x 64.3mm
as a reference, Fujifilm X-M5 is 111.9 x 66.6
f/2.4 aperture
1″ sensor
Vertical LCD – see here
The concept of how it will operate
Made in China
We will update this regarding the authenticity of this information as well as the image.
7Artisans today announced a new AF 50mm F1.8 lens for Sony E, L, and Nikon Z Mounts. The Lens only costs $228, which is affordable and gives us a nifty fifty range. A perfect lens under budget.
Key Features
Full-Frame | f/1.8 to f/16
Fast Aperture Everyday Prime
STM Stepping Motor
Two Aspherical Lens Elements
Multilayer Coatings
11-Blade Diaphragm
AF/MF Mode Switch
USB Port for Firmware Upgrades
The DJI Inspire 3 has become the first drone to get the Netflix approval for cinematography, The DJI Inspire 3 comes with Zenmuse X9-8K Air camera, a full-frame module capable of recording up to 8 K25 CinemaDNG or 8 K75 Apple ProRes RAW.
Here are some specifications of the DJI Air 3 drone
8K75 Apple ProRes RAW video
S&Q Mode: Up to full-frame 4 K120 ProRes RAW without cropping
Dual Native ISO at full-frame 30 fps and below
EI 800/4000 at 24 fps for film production
EI 320/1600 above 30 fps for commercial and TV production
14+ stops of dynamic range for capturing rich highlights and shadows in complex lighting scenarios, and allowing for more possibilities during editing
So this is one of the best cameras for aerial imagery, According to Netflix. The cost of the drone is approximately $16,499 at the B&H Store. So, only a professional filmmaker can afford this. We do hope and expect DJI will start approving FPV drones too in near future.
Let’s compare the Nikon Z5 II versus the Nikon Z6 II camera now. Z5 II camera was announced recently on April 2025 and features all the possible latest updates straight out from Nikon professional camera that include AI AF, that helps 9 different types of subject detection 🔎 automatically and it also has a dedicated bird eye auto focus mode that even cameras like the Nikon Z6 Mark III are waiting for an update, at the time I am writing this article on April 4, 2025.
Similarly, not only are the updates limited to AI auto focus, we also have 7.5 stops of image stabilizer that can be linked to the Nikon AF points to ensure the best stability possible in this segment.
The list goes on, so let’s compare side-by-side the advantages of the new Z5 Mark II camera compared to the Z6 Mark II.
Feature
Nikon Z5 II
Nikon Z6 II
Image Processor
EXPEED 7
EXPEED 6
9 AI Subject Detection
Yes
No
Bird Eye AF
Yes
No
Human & Animal Eye AF
Yes
Yes
AF sensitivity
– 19 Ev
– 5 Ev
Design and build comparisons of both the cameras
Both cameras feature a magnesium alloy body, and both of them are weather sealed, so you don’t have to worry about using them outdoors in a kind of windy or rainy situation if you are using weather-sealed lenses. Other than that, the weight and the size are approximately the same. The biggest noticeable difference when you pick both of them in your hand is the kind of display screen the cameras are using. Z5 II is using a fully articulating touch display screen that helps you to create content on the go, whereas the Z6 Mark II camera features a tilting display screen, which limits its use to photographers only.
The other noticeable difference is a bright 3.69 million dot electronic viewfinder with 3000 nits of brightness.
Build & Display Feature Comparison
Feature
Nikon Z5 II
Nikon Z6 II
Body Material
Magnesium Alloy
Magnesium Alloy
Weather Sealed
Yes
Yes
Display Screen
Fully Articulating Touchscreen
Tilting Touchscreen
EVF
3.69 M-dot, 3000 nits
3.69 M-dot (no brightness spec)
Top LCD Display
No
Yes
Ideal For
Hybrid creators (photo + video)
Photographers
But apart from the almost identical controls and ports, both of them have dual card slots. In the camera, the additional advantage we get in the Z6 Mark II is the top display screen, and in the Z5 II, we don’t have that, so that makes the design difference complete.
Overall, both cameras are highly usable for photographers, but if you are a hybrid shooter, the Nikon Z5 Mark II camera is more usable design-wise due to its fully articulating display screen.
Photography features comparison
Nikon Z5 II and Nikon Z6 Mark II feature a bit different sensor readout speed, since the Nikon Z5 Mark II camera uses the sensor from Nikon Zf whose readout speed is faster than the Nikon Z6 II camera, resulting in better images while keeping away rolling shutter effect as much as possible.
Also, the continuous shooting speed of the new Nikon Z5 II with the help of the latest EXPEED 7 image processor goes up to 14 frames per second in JPG and RAW it’s up to 11 frames per second, and with upcoming updates, the mechanical shutter will support RAW up to 14 FPS. And if you use the electronic shutter of the Nikon Z5 II camera, you will get the continuous shooting speed of 30 frames per second, which is insane when compared to the Nikon Z6 II. In the Nikon Z6 II camera, the continuous shooting speed reaches 14 frames per second in 12-bit RAW, so it is also quite usable.
Burst Shooting & Sensor Speed Comparison
Feature
Nikon Z5 II
Nikon Z6 II
Mechanical Shutter Speed
14 FPS with 14 Bit RAW
14 FPS (12-bit RAW)
Electronic Shutter Burst
Up to 30 FPS
Not available
Sensor Readout Speed
Faster (from Nikon Zf) 24ms
Slower 50.8 ms
More than these two differences, the biggest difference is due to the presence of EXPEED 7 image processor, we are getting AI autofocus inside the new Nikon Z5 II camera, and with the help of that the camera can detect 9 different types of moving subjects automatically which also includes bird eye autofocus mode, specifically for wildlife photography.
Nikon Z6 Mark II camera does detect human and animal eyes but the autofocus algorithm isn’t updated that much to support AI autofocus just like we have in Nikon Z5 II.
So for photographers it’s not only important to push or uplift the continuous shooting speed to a new benchmark, but at the very same time, it’s also very important to perfectly do subject tracking.
Now let’s talk about the sensor shift image stabilization system. The Nikon Z6 Mark II camera provides up to five stops of shutter speed compensation, whereas the new Z5 Mark II camera features 7.5 stops of shutter speed compensation with the help of new IBIS tech. Not only limited to that—with the new EXPEED 7 image processor—now you can link your VR with camera autofocusing points so you get perfect stability and true 7.5 stops of IBIS from your camera.
Feature
Nikon Z5 II
Nikon Z6 II
IBIS (In-Body Stabilization)
7.5 Stops
5 Stops
VR Linked with AF Points
Yes
No
Pixel Shift Mode
Yes
No
The expandable ISO range of both the cameras is the same—up to 204800.
ISO Range Comparison
Feature
Nikon Z5 II
Nikon Z6 II
Native
64,000
51,200
ISO Range (Expanded)
Up to 204800
Up to 204800
Low Light Performance
Improved with AI AF
Good with standard AF
The low light AF sensitivity of the Nikon Z5 Mark 2 camera is up to -19.0 EV, the camera can do pinpoint AF in nearly dark situations, whereas the Nikon Z6 II camera is limited to -5 EV.
The pixel shift mode is also now available in the Nikon Z5 II camera. With the help of this mode, you can generate 96 megapixel of high-resolution images, but you have to keep your camera still on a tripod and the images will be processed by the Nikon NX software.
Verdict / Conclusion: Best still photography camera – Nikon Z5 II
Nikon Z5 II with its vari-angle display screen and 3000 nits of brightness EVF, not only from the design part but also from its core specification where we find ZF sensor which is quite bit faster while having the readout speed of 23ms, at the very same time the camera uses brand new EXPEED 7 image processor which implements AI autofocus algorithm directly coming from Nikon Z8 and Z9, moreover this the autofocus sensitivity has been upscaled to a next level where you can detect subjects up to -19 EV which was limited to -5 EV in Nikon Z6 II and the cherry on top thing is now the sensor-shift image stabilization is up to 7.5 stops and you can also link your IBIS with camera autofocus point which is completely a brand new thing and gives super stable shot.
Nikon Z5 II has been upscaled from upside down and every single core spec has been updated and now it’s even far better than Nikon Z6 Mark 2 camera so don’t do a mistake by buying the Z6 II get Nikon Z5 II it’s far more better than the Z6 II in terms of still photography.
Feature
Nikon Z5 II
Nikon Z6 II
Autofocus Sensitivity
AF works in -19.0 EV low light (better for dark scenes)
Limited to -5.0 EV AF sensitivity
Pixel Shift Mode
Available (generates 96MP high-res images via software)
Not available
Image Stabilization (IBIS)
Up to 7.5 stops with AF-point linked IBIS
Up to 5 stops, no AF-point linked IBIS
Image Processor
EXPEED 7 (new, faster, supports AI algorithms from Z8/Z9)
Dual EXPEED 6
Display & EVF
Brighter EVF with 3000 nits, possibly better display
Standard brightness
Sensor Readout Speed
23ms readout, helps reduce rolling shutter
50 ms
Design & Build
Fully refined design with improved internals
Older design
Subject Detection AF
Inherited from Z8/Z9 (advanced AI tracking)
More basic subject tracking
Price-to-Performance
More value-oriented with high-end features
Slightly older tech for the same/lower price
Video Core Specification
Let’s compare the video specifications of both cameras. The Nikon Z5 Mark II camera can record 4:2:2 10-bit videos, 12-bit videos, and RAW videos. Both of these are significant advantages that allow you can internally record high-quality RAW videos in the camera.
So the Nikon Z5 Mark II camera gives you the next level of colour grading experience. The audio recording also includes linear PCM at 48 kilohertz, 24-bit for any MOV formats. Also, you get 16-bit for MP4, enhancing the overall audio quality for video production.
While researching, I have found that Nikon Z6 Mark II camera also supports linear PCM and AAC, but it does not specify specifically the bit depth beyond the standard 16-bit for AAC and its internal video recording is limited to 8-bit, so in that you are not getting the quality which the recently announced Nikon Z5 II offers.
The Nikon Z5 II camera offers RAW video capability internally inside the camera. You can record N-RAW videos up to 4K 30 FPS and even 4K 60 FPS in DX mode.
Nikon Z6 Mark II camera gives you limited 8-bit recording capability, and if you want to take out RAW videos, you have to use external recorders and switch it to the HDMI port, so that’s a very messy process, and even then, you are not getting the high quality.
Time-lapse, electronic VR, time codes, N-Log, HDR (HLG), wave-form display, etc.
Time-lapse, electronic VR, time codes, N-Log, HDR (HLG)
I have found that the recently announced Nikon Z5 II camera offers RED LUTs made for upscaling your overall cinematography experience to the next level. At the very same time, those LUTs are very helpful even in wedding cinematography.
Additionally, your overall cinematography experience becomes more and more enjoyable when you get the support of Nikon’s latest AI autofocus technology as well as 7.5 stops of sensor stabilization to ensure stable and smooth shots.
Overall conclusion: The best video camera is the Nikon Z5 II.
The best camera, when we compare the core specifications of both, without a doubt, is the Nikon Z5 II camera, so we highly recommend you to get the Nikon Z5 Mark II camera over the Z6 II.
That’s a big question we are getting in the next set of every comment when we are posting comparisons related to Canon R50V.
We have to understand a basic rule that whenever a camera maker announces a specific camera, like the 50V has been announced by Canon, they generally wait for the peak sales period, which is approximately 7 to 8 months from the shipping date.
And in that specific period, they try to avoid announcing a camera in approximately the same price range, so there is very little chance that we will see Canon R10V in the year 2025. Since the shipping date of Canon R50V is April 28, and if you consider a 7 to 8 months gap, then it falls somewhere around November and December. So it is safe to assume that even if they are planning to announce a R10V, we will see it in the first quarter of 2026 or later on.
Technology Limitations
Canon’s 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, which is being used inside Canon R10, Canon R50, and Canon R50V, has been stretched to its technical limits already in the R50V.
As we all know, the Canon 24-megapixel DPAF CMOS sensor has a readout speed of somewhere around 25 milliseconds, and it’s based on FSI technology. The first threshold was already visible when the Canon R10 was announced. Due to the readout speed limitation, even in R10, we have to face a 1.5X crop in 4K 60 FPS.
In the recently announced Canon R50V camera, Canon has done everything possible to stretch the limits of the existing 24MP FSI CMOS sensor, and that’s why we are getting clog3, 10-bit internal recording at 4K 60 FPS from the existing sensor when paired up with the latest Digic X image processor.
And again, due to the readout limitation, we still have a 1.5X crop at 4K 60 FPS recording.
Now, if Canon is planning to introduce an R10V camera in near future, they have to use a new sensor, and they have no other option left since we have already seen the stretched limits of the existing 24MP FSI DPAF CMOS sensor in the R50V camera.
The Canon 32 MP sensor is more than 6 years old, a good competitor of the Sony 26 MP sensor used in ZV-E10 II, A6700, and FX30. The 32-megapixel sensor was first announced inside the Canon 90D body, which was announced back in August 2019, so it is more than 6-7 years old. While Canon R7 can record 4K 60 FPS uncropped with a line-skipping method, where there is a loss in quality, if you want to record high-quality 4K 60 FPS video, you have to face a 1.8X crop.
Canon R10V may arrive with Canon 32 MP DPAF sensor: By adopting the R7’s 32.5-megapixel sensor, Canon could position the R10V as a strong competitor to the Sony ZV-E10 II, offering uncropped 4K 60fps and a robust vlogging feature set.
Another important thing is that both Canon R7 and R10 were announced on the same day, in May 2022. So it is quite obvious that Canon will prefer a high-end body to introduce its new sensor technology into the market, which will help Canon generate more revenue. That is what every camera maker does—for example, Sony first introduced the FX30 camera with a 26MP sensor. Although the 26MP sensor has been used by Fuji for the past 2 to 3 years, that doesn’t matter in Sony’s lineup. It started with the FX30, then Sony used that sensor in the Sony A6700 camera, and later on, they finally introduced in the Sony ZV-E10 Mark II.
So as you can see, technology travels into more affordable bodies over time, but at the time of introduction, camera makers generally select a higher-end body.
Instead of refreshing Canon R10 series in Q4 of 2025 or Q1 of 2026, there is a high probability the Canon R7V or R7 Mk II with a brand new sensor capable to record 6.2k open gate will be prioritized
What’s Coming Next from Canon in the APS-C Range in 2025?
Most likely, Canon will introduce the Canon R7V / R7 Mk II camera first, even before refreshing the Canon R10 lineup
It also aligns with an existing set of rumors [Canon upcoming cameras 2025]: As per the information we have published in the past, Canon is planning to introduce Canon R7 successor Canon R7 Mark II in Q3 or Q4 of 2025, but its inresting to see what coming first, Canon R7 MK II or R7V or both of them will arive together?
Canon R7 Mark II, a photography-focused upgrade, and the R7V, a video-centric version tailored for videographers. Having box style design, without a mechanical shutter, 6k 60FPS, with 32-bit audio option,n and with active cooling vents will help filmmakers and cinematographers to pick a camera for professional use.
As we have already discussed above that Canon introduces their new sensor tech and capabilities in their mid-to-high-tier bodies first. So, Canon R7 or assocated series like Canon R7 Mk II / R7V is a perfect and most logical choice for such an upgrade.
Canon R50V vs Sony Z10 Mark II. Let’s discuss the major differences between the two, then we will do some deep core specification analysis so you can understand very clearly which camera you should buy.
Canon R50 V Specifications and Pricing
Initially, the Canon R50 V camera is available with a 24-megapixel DPAF CMOS sensor, the same sensor that is being used by entry-level cameras such as Canon R50 and Canon R10. If you buy it with a kit lens, you have to pay approximately $849, and when you are buying the body only, you have to pay approximately $649.
Sony Z10 Mark II Specifications and Pricing
Now, the Sony Z10 Mark II camera was released on July 10, 2024, and uses a 26-megapixel APS-C BSI CMOS sensor from FX30 or Sony A6700 camera, meaning it’s a flagship sensor. With a kit lens, you have to pay $1,099, and without a kit lens, you have to pay only $999.
So, the Canon body is a lot more affordable compared to the Sony Z10 Mark II camera. Now, let’s dive deep into the detailed core specifications of both cameras.
Key Differences in Sensor Technologies
So, initially, we have some basic differences between the two. The Canon uses an FSI CMOS sensor with a resolution from entry-level models, and the Sony Z10 Mark II uses a BSI CMOS sensor from higher-end models. Along with that, we also have a price difference between the two.
Best Camera for Recording 4K 60p Video
Crop Factor Comparison
If you compare both the Canon R50 V and Sony ZV-E10 Mark II, the advantage of the Sony ZV-E10 Mark II camera is clearly visible as it does only a 1.1x crop while recording 4K 60p video. On the other side, we have the Canon R50 V camera, which does a 1.5x crop while recording 4K 60p video. Both cameras allow you to record 10-bit videos at 4K 60p, but at the same time, you have to face a crop in Canon.
Usability and Stabilization
Usability-wise, the Sony ZV-E10 Mark II camera is more usable since, even while recording 4K 60fps with a crop, we can utilize the Active SteadyShot mode as well as the gyro-based image stabilization mode. If you are shooting handheld videos, that will, in turn, help you get stable footage without a gimbal. The electronic image stabilization (EIS) is very effective when you are using it at 30fps or 24fps recording. However, since it already has a very significant 1.5x crop, it doesn’t work that well.
Final Recommendation Best Camera for high-speed 4k videos
So, overall, for 4K 60fps recording, we highly recommend you to get the Sony ZV-E10 Mark II camera. Codec and Color Depth in Both Cameras
Video Codecs
Canon R50 V Video Capabilities
Now, with a 24-megapixel FSI CMOS sensor, our recently announced Canon R50 V camera is able to record 10-bit 4:2:2 videos in H.265 or H.264 codec. You can also record your videos in Canon Log 3 as well as in HLG HDR modes—all these features are available in this entry-level model.
Sony Z10 Mark II Video Capabilities
With a 26-megapixel BSI CMOS sensor, Sony does the same. It also records 10-bit 4:2:2 videos in XAVC HS (H.265) and XAVC S (H.264). Additionally, it supports S-Log2, S-Log3, and Hybrid Log Gamma (HLG), offering up to 14 stops of dynamic range.
Video codec – Comparison and Conclusion
So, in terms of video codec, both cameras record the same 10-bit videos, and neither of them has any limitations over log profiles or any other video codec restrictions. In terms of usability for beginners, videographers, and content creators, both cameras perform well. We are not discussing professional use at this moment.
Detailed Video Specifications Comparison Table
Feature
Canon R50V
Sony ZV-E10 Mark II
Max Video Resolution
4K 60p (cropped, crop factor unspecified), 4K 23.98p (assumed uncropped based on preview)
4K 60p (1.1x crop), 4K 30p/24p (uncropped, oversampled from 5.6K)
Full HD Capabilities
1080p up to 120p (implied from slow-motion options)
1080p up to 120p
Video Codecs
H.265, H.264 (10-bit 4:2:2 internal with log)
XAVC HS (H.265), XAVC S (H.264) (10-bit 4:2:2 internal)
Color Profiles
C-Log, custom picture profiles from Canon cinema series
Cropped in 4K 60p (extent unspecified), uncropped in 4K 23.98p (assumed)
1.1x crop in 4K 60p, uncropped in 4K 30p/24p
Best Camera for Live Streaming
Canon R50 V Live Streaming Capabilities
The recently announced Canon R50 V supports streaming up to 4K 60fps via USB-C, but at the same time, you have to consider the fact that it still has a 1.5x crop. This means you need to use ultra-wide-angle lenses when placing the camera in front of you.
Sony ZV-E10 Mark II Live Streaming Capabilities
On the other hand, in the Sony ZV-E10 Mark II, video streaming or USB streaming remains limited to 4K 30fps via UVC/USC.
Best Camera for Live Streaming
So, you can consider the Canon R50 V as a clear winner in terms of streaming capability, but it also suffers from a crop limitation, which you need to keep in mind while choosing between these two cameras.
Canon R50V Autofocus Capabilities
Canon R50V camera uses a Dual Pixel CMOS autofocus sensor paired with DIGIC X image processor, and according to Canon’s official press release, they are using the same autofocus AF algorithm as they have used in the Canon R5 Mark II camera. The camera also includes subject tracking modes, which include birds, animals, airplanes, moving vehicles, as well as one of the most important modes that has been added to this camera—face registration. Here, you can technically register one, two, or multiple faces, and even in a crowd when you are creating a video sequence, like when you’re doing wedding cinematography. Then, even in a crowd, if you have already registered the bride and groom’s faces in the camera, it will track only those two.
Sony ZV-E10 Mark II Autofocus Capabilities
Now, in the Sony ZV-E10 Mark II camera, we have an advanced video autofocus tracking mode, which is directly coming from the Sony A7R V. It does have predictive AI tracking, just as we have seen in higher-end Sony models, so it is also very good at predicting human faces, human bodies, animals, birds, and eyes. Moreover, the camera also has a built-in AI auto-framing mode, which, in turn, the Canon R50 V doesn’t have. This particular AI auto-framing mode helps content creators, especially solo content creators—those who create cooking videos in a single room. The camera will automatically track them and crop them in a frame, like the way a professional cinematographer shoots their movement.
Best Camera with Usable AF in Video
So, each of these cameras does have brilliant autofocus tracking capability and some specialized modes. The Canon R50 V is more suitable for wedding cinematography, where you can register people’s faces for autofocus tracking, whereas in the Sony ZV-E10 Mark II camera, we have AI auto-framing mode, which is more useful for content creators.
Canon R50 V Image Stabilization
Canon R50 V camera is a base model, and we are not able to expect too much out of it. Since the absence of sensor-shift image stabilization looks a bit logical to me, any camera maker out there is not offering any sort of IBIS mechanism in that price range. Although the camera does have EIS (Electronic Image Stabilization), which is effective for video, you have to use ultra-wide-angle lenses when you are using EIS in the camera for creating content or shooting any sort of videos. But keep in mind that EIS is only effective in shooting videos, not in still photography.
Sony ZV-E10 Mark II Image Stabilization
Sony ZV-E10 Mark II camera comes at a higher price, and at least we were expecting the presence of some sort of IBIS feature inside it. But for video recording purposes, we do get Active I.S. inside this camera, supported with a gyro-based image stabilization system. So, specifically, when you are using gyro, you get very stable footage with minimal crop, but you have to post-process it on your laptop or PC using Sony Catalyst Browse software. Other than that, we have Active I.S. mode, where Sony does crop significantly, but we do get gimbal-like stable footage from the camera.
Best camera for Handheld Video
So overall, none of the cameras feature sensor-shift image stabilization systems, but in the Sony ZV-E10 Mark II camera, we do have gyro-based image stabilization as well as Active Mode, which is very effective.Price-wise, what we are getting in Canon R50 V also looks very logical to me, specifically if you are into content creation. So, it’s very obvious that if you are paying a bit higher price for a camera body like the Sony ZV-E10 Mark II, you will get better image stabilization performance, which is specifically made for videographers and cinematographers.
Audio Specifications
Feature
Canon R50V
Sony ZV-E10 Mark II
Microphone Port
Yes (3.5mm)
Yes (3.5mm)
Headphone Port
Yes (3.5mm)
Yes (3.5mm)
Onboard Microphone
Standard stereo mic (not emphasized as vlogging-specific)
Directional 3-capsule mic with windscreen (optimized for vlogging, improved over original)
Digital Audio Support
Digital hot shoe (24-bit, 4-channel audio with compatible Canon mics)
Multi-interface shoe (digital audio with compatible Sony mics, e.g., ECM-W2BT)
Body Design & Battery Life
Body design-wise, both cameras are the same, and even the weight is almost equal, at under 400 grams. However, in the Sony ZV-E10 Mark II camera, we get a deeper hand grip as well as a battery life similar to that of a full-frame camera. The NP-FZ100 battery is capable of giving you approximately 610 shots and more than 2 hours of continuous 4K 30p video recording.
Body Design
Feature
Canon R50V
Sony ZV-E10 Mark II
Dimensions
116 x 86 x 69 mm
121 x 68 x 54 mm
Weight
Not specified (likely ~375g with battery, based on R50)
377g (with battery and SD card)
Viewfinder
None (EVF omitted to reduce cost)
None
Screen
3-inch vari-angle LCD (lower resolution than R50, exact dots unspecified)
Digital hot shoe (24-bit, 4-channel audio support)
Multi-interface shoe (digital audio support)
Wireless
Wi-Fi (version not specified), Bluetooth (assumed based on R50)
Wi-Fi (2.4 GHz), Bluetooth 5.0
Battery and Storage
Feature
Canon R50V
Sony ZV-E10 Mark II
Battery Type
LP-E17 (same as R50)
NP-FZ100 (larger capacity than original ZV-E10’s NP-FW50)
Battery Life (CIPA)
Not specified (likely ~230 shots based on R50)
610 shots (significant improvement over ZV-E10’s 440 shots)
Charging
USB-C charging supported
USB-C charging supported (faster charging with PD support)
Storage
Single SD slot (UHS-II)
Single SD slot (UHS-II support, faster than ZV-E10’s UHS-I)
In contrast, the Canon R50 V camera uses the regular LP-E17 battery, which offers approximately 230 shots and around 1 hour and 20 minutes of 4K 30p video recording.
Still Photography & Sensor Comparison
For still photography, the Canon R50 V camera uses a 24-megapixel FSI CMOS sensor and supports up to 12 FPS with an Electronic First Curtain Shutter (EFCS) and approximately 15 FPS with an electronic shutter.
Whereas in the Sony ZV-E10 Mark II camera, we have a 26MP BSI CMOS sensor with a maximum continuous shooting speed of 11 FPS, limited to an electronic shutter only.Technically, having an EFCS sensor-based camera is a better option if you’re planning to shoot sports or wildlife photography.
As we all know, Canon’s 100-400mm lens is also available at a budget-friendly price, making it a great pair for those into sports and wildlife photography, as well as content creation. However, at the same time, we must consider the advantage of a 26MP BSI CMOS sensor.
Feature
Canon R50V
Sony ZV-E10 Mark II
Resolution
24MP
26MP
Burst Shooting
15 fps (electronic), 12 fps (electronic first curtain)
11 fps (mechanical/electronic)
RAW Support
Yes
Yes (Compressed/Uncompressed)
Image Stabilization
None (lens-based only)
None (lens-based only)
Best Camera for Still Shooters
If you are not into sports and wildlife photography and are looking for higher detail, better low-light performance, and enhanced dynamic range, then getting a 26MP sensor will be a better decision.
Final Conclusion: Which Camera is Best for You—Canon R50 V or Sony ZV-E10 Mark II?
Tailored for Videographers & Content Creators
Both of them are custom-tailored for videographers or content creators, and the best part is Canon is offering us a 10-bit video recording mode in a budget body. But at the same time, we do have some limitations, like having a 1.5x crop in 4K 60 FPS mode. Other than that, we also have limitations in the Canon RF mount, which actually limits us in selecting budget lenses.
Canon Lens Availability & Limitations
So even if you have purchased a budget body from Canon, then it will be a bit hard to find a usable prime lens within budget. Specifically, if you have purchased the Sony ZV-E10 Mark II camera by paying a bit higher price, you can use lenses like Viltrox Air series, which come at a very low price with usable high-grade optics.
Choosing Based on Personal Requirement
But again, it all depends upon your own personal requirement and usage. If you have already sorted out the best lenses that you are going to use for the Canon R50 V camera and having a crop in 4K 60 FPS mode doesn’t bother you, then without a doubt, the R50 V is much more usable for you.
Advantages of Sony ZV-E10 Mark II
Similarly, in the Sony ZV-E10 Mark II camera, we are getting uncropped 4K 60 FPS mode, we are getting active image stabilization as well as AI autofocus and ZV-E10’s in-body stabilization, plus some extra features and extra battery life in the Sony camera. The most important factor is the range of lenses available for the ZV-E10 Mark II.
Final Verdict
So for me, the best budget camera is the Canon R50 V, but if you consider lens availability, then you have to spend a lot more to get perfect Canon lenses for your camera.
Decision-Making Pros and Cons Table: Canon R50V vs Sony ZV-E10 Mark II
Sony has finally announced the VENICE Extension System Mini. The main highlight is its form factor—as usual, it is very portable and able to record 8K videos, weighs approximately 0.54 kg, and is very easy to carry for some special kinds of shoots where portability is the main factor.
This system Mini is compatible with VENICE 2 6K and 8K models, and most importantly, the VENICE 2 6K model is now able to capture 8K resolution with this system, although it will require a system software update.
The improvement that has been made in the System Mini is that you are now getting approximately 4.5m (14 feet) of cable, allowing you to move a greater distance while keeping the head unit of the camera along with the lens only.
The System Mini is based on E-mount, and you can easily use E-mount lenses. It also supports hybrid autofocus with Eye AF tracking. Additionally, you can use PL-mount lenses with the help of an adapter, which in turn also transfers the lens metadata through the input port.
The VENICE 2 System Mini will be showcased at the upcoming NAB 2025 show in Las Vegas, beginning on April 6, 2025. The camera is now available for pre-order at B&H stores.
Buy Canon Lenses, Buy Music CD or Digital Camera at amazon it helps this site, and you do not pay anything extra, it is just a way to help support this site.
New Camera Website, we list all type of new camera information, price review and all type camera rumors, subscribe us or follow us via twitter or facebook.
Disclaimer: We have attempted to select useful information to include on New Camera, and to ensure that the resources we have included on the site -- as well as the way we have described them -- are accurate, fair, and balanced. However, we make no claims, warranties, or other representations concerning the accuracy, completeness, or utility of the information provided, or concerning the abilities or performance of the organizations, agencies, companies, and other resources presented through New Camera