Join More Than 50,000+ Subscribers and get latest camera news and rumors
NEW CAMERA VIDEOS ON YOUTUBE
|
By admin, on January 18th, 2025
Nikon Z8 versus Leica SL-3 S: Which is the Best Camera Among These Two? If you are planning to buy the Leica SL3 S camera, you must first look at the Z8 core specification comparison table before making a decision.
Design Comparison
| Feature |
Nikon Z8 |
Leica SL3-S |
| Lens Mount |
Nikon Z |
L-Mount |
| Build Material |
Magnesium Alloy |
Aluminum, Magnesium Alloy |
| Dimensions (W x H x D) |
5.7 x 4.7 x 3.3″ (144 x 118.5 x 83 mm) |
Not Specified |
| Weight |
2.0 lb (910 g, with battery and recording media) |
4.72 lb (2139 g, with battery) |
| Display Type |
3.2″ 4-Axis Tilting Touchscreen LCD, 2,100,000 dots |
3.2″ Tilting Touchscreen LCD, 2,332,800 dots |
| Viewfinder Type |
0.5″ OLED, 3,690,000 dots, Approx. 0.8x Magnification |
OLED, 5,760,000 dots, Approx. 0.76x Magnification |
| Eye Point |
23 mm |
21 mm |
| Weather Sealing |
Yes |
Yes |
| Wireless Connectivity |
Wi-Fi 5 (2.4 / 5 GHz), Bluetooth 5.0 |
2.4 GHz MIMO Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.0 |
| Dual Card Slots |
CFexpress Type B / XQD + SD (UHS-II) |
1x CFexpress Type B, 1x SD (UHS-II) |
| GPS |
Yes (via smartphone) |
Yes (via smartphone) |
Which camera is better for longer hours of work, like weddings and events lasting hours, the Leica SL3 S or Nikon Z8?
In the design comparison, it is visible that the Leica is built like a tank, heavier, but at the same time, the electronic viewfinder and the display part of the camera are of more premium quality. For more prolonged shooting, such as during weddings and events lasting over 7-8 hours or more, it’s recommended to hold a camera that makes you comfortable for longer hours of work, like the Nikon Z8.
Photography Comparison
| Feature |
Leica SL3-S |
Nikon Z8 |
| Sensor Resolution |
24.6 MP (Effective) |
45.7 MP (Effective) |
Sensor Tech
|
BSI CMOS |
STACKED BSI CMOS |
| Sensor Type |
Full-Frame |
Full-Frame |
| ISO Range |
100 to 200,000 (manual) |
64 to 25,600 (Extended: 32 to 102,400) |
| Continuous Shooting |
Up to 30 fps |
Up to 20 fps Raw, 30 fps JPEG Shooting |
Image Stabilization
|
Upto 5 – Stops (max) |
5.5 (Max 6 Stops with VR Lens) + AI IS |
| Autofocus Points |
779 Points (Phase + Contrast Detection) |
493 Points (Phase Detection Only) + AI AF tracking Modes |
| White Balance Options |
Auto, Cloudy, Color Temp, Daylight, Flash, Fluorescent, Manual |
Auto, Cloudy, Direct Sunlight, Flash, Fluorescent, Incandescent, Custom |
| Shutter Speed |
Mechanical: 1/8000 to 30 sec; Electronic: 1/16000 to 60 sec |
Electronic: 1/32000 to 30 sec; Bulb Mode Supported |
| Metering Modes |
Center-Weighted, Highlight Weighted, Multi-Zone, Spot |
Center-Weighted, Highlight Weighted, Matrix, Spot |
| Aspect Ratios |
3:2, 16:9, 17:9 |
1:1, 3:2, 16:9 |
| Image File Format |
DNG, JPEG |
JPEG, RAW |
| Bit Depth |
14-Bit |
14-Bit |
| Self-Timer |
2/5/10/20-Second Delay |
2/5/10/20-Second Delay |
| Built-In ND Filter |
No |
No |
| Capture Type |
Stills & Video |
Stills & Video |
In the photographic core specification comparison, the best part is the Nikon Z8 camera with its 45-megapixel BSI CMOS sensor. Along with that, the Nikon Z8 also features, AI Autofocus modes directly come from the Nikon Z9. The best part is in continuous shooting mode, Even at the full 45-megapixel resolution, you can capture 30 frames per second without any issues.
Leica is more of a bit retro and classical type camera, and it is limited to a traditional 24-megapixel BSI CMOS sensor that we have seen in the Panasonic S5 II. Although the number of autofocus points is much lower compared to the Nikon Z8, it doesn’t feature any AI autofocus tracking hardware that we have in the Z8. But again, if you are a Leica user, then you may prefer having a Leica camera, as Leica’s color science is quite different from Nikon’s.
If you compare the core specifications, without a doubt, the Nikon Z8 is a clear winner in the competition.
Video Comparison
| Feature |
Leica SL3-S |
Nikon Z8 |
| Max Resolution |
UHD 6K (5888 x 3312) |
UHD 8K (8256 x 4644) |
| Frame Rates (Max) |
4K at 60 fps [Crop] |
4K at 120 fps [Crop] |
4k 60 FPS
|
Yes, Cropped |
Uncropped |
| Slow Motion |
No |
Yes |
| Video Formats |
H.264, H.265 (4:2:0/4:2:2 8/10-Bit), ProRes 4:2:2 |
ProRes RAW HQ, H.265 4:2:2, H.264 4:2:0 |
| Internal Recording |
10-Bit 4:2:2 |
ProRes RAW HQ 12-Bit |
| External Recording |
4:2:2 12-Bit via HDMI |
12-Bit via HDMI |
| Audio Formats |
AAC, LPCM |
24-Bit LPCM |
| Gamma Curves |
Rec709, Rec2020 |
HDR-HLG |
| Recording Limit |
No |
No |
| IP Streaming |
No |
No |
| Built-In Microphone |
Stereo |
Stereo |
| Autofocus Points (Video) |
779 Points |
493 Points + AI AF modes Active |
| Heat Dissipation |
Passive |
Passive |
| Maximum Bitrate |
600 Mbps |
Up to 5780 Mbps (8K ProRes RAW) |
Which camera is better for professional photography use, the Nikon Z8 or the Leica SL3 S?
It’s very clear from the beginning of the comparison table that the Nikon Z8 camera is able to capture 8K videos and offers 4K video recording up to 120 frames per second. So, technically, the Nikon Z8 is quite a bit more advanced. At the same time, the Z8 camera also offers the ability to record high-quality 12-bit internal RAW video. Due to its nature and the very angle display screen, you can also create content with the camera if you like to follow platforms like YouTube.
Does the Leica SL3 S camera offer better video features compared to the Nikon Z8?
The Leica SL3 S camera does have a limited set of videography specifications and features, such as a tilting display screen on the back. However, if you have specific videography needs, the Nikon Z8 is superior.
Which camera offers more value for the price, the Nikon Z8 or the Leica SL3 S?
Among the two, as per the set of core specifications, the Nikon Z8 looks very promising and is more advanced compared to the Leica SL3 S for the price you’re paying. But if you are a Leica enthusiast and would love to buy a Leica camera, then you can still go with the Leica SL3 S if you wish to.
Here you can purchase online B&H Store | Adorama | Amazon.com |
By admin, on January 17th, 2025
We are comparing the Leica SL3-S camera side by side with the Panasonic S5 IIX. Before we begin, I must tell you that there is a significant price difference between them. Starting with the design part. Next, we will move to the photography part, where we will compare the major core specifications that build up a camera’s character map. This will help photographers decide which camera to buy. In the final part of the comparison, in the third table, we have the video core specifications compared against each other.
Here you can purchase online B&H Store | Adorama | Amazon.com |
Get Panasonic S IIX DEAL at Amazon.com
1. Design Comparison
| Feature |
Leica SL3-S |
Panasonic S5IIx |
| Lens Mount |
L-Mount |
L-Mount |
| Build Material |
Aluminum, Magnesium Alloy |
Magnesium Alloy |
| Dimensions (W x H x D) |
Not specified |
5.29 x 4.03 x 3.55″ (13.44 x 10.24 x 9.02 cm) |
| Weight |
4.72 lb (2139 g) with battery |
1.64 lb (744 g) with recording media |
| Monitor Display |
3.2″ Tilting Touchscreen LCD, 2,332,800 dots |
3″ Free-Angle Tilting Touchscreen LCD, 1,840,000 dots |
| Viewfinder |
Built-In Electronic OLED, 5,760,000 dots, Approx. 0.76x magnification |
Built-In Electronic OLED, 3,680,000 dots, Approx. 0.78x magnification |
| Eye Point |
21 mm |
21 mm |
| Weather Sealing |
Yes |
Yes |
| Wireless Connectivity |
2.4 GHz MIMO Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.0 |
2.4 / 5 GHz Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS |
Yes (via connected smartphone) |
No |
| Dual Card Slots |
1x CFexpress Type B, 1x SD (UHS-II) |
Dual SD (UHS-II) |
Conclusion: So, from the design part, it’s very clear that Leica excels with its design. The most visible thing is the red logo and tank-like design that promises a very well-built quality camera. Besides that, we have a superior resolution electronic viewfinder with 5.7 million dots and a higher-resolution display screen. But again, there are some limitations in the display. It is tiltable but cannot be used for filming yourself. So, for content creators, the Leica SL3-S is not made for you.
The biggest difference you can spot, apart from all this, is that the Panasonic S5IIx camera features an active cooling mechanism with a built-in fan inside the camera. That’s why the camera can handle heat, whereas the Leica SL3-S has no active onboard cooling mechanism.
Now let’s compare the photographic core specifications of both cameras.
2. Photography Comparison
| Feature |
Leica SL3-S |
Panasonic S5IIx |
| Sensor Resolution |
24.6 MP effective (Full-Frame BSI CMOS) |
24.2 MP effective (Full-Frame CMOS) |
| ISO Range |
100 to 200,000 (Manual Mode) |
100 to 51,200 (Extended: 50 to 204,800) |
| Image Stabilization |
Sensor-Shift, 5-Axis |
Sensor-Shift, 5-Axis |
| Shutter Speed |
Mechanical: 1/8000 to 30 sec, Electronic: 1/16000 to 60 sec |
Mechanical: 1/8000 to 60 sec, Electronic: 1/8000 to 60 sec |
| Continuous Shooting |
Up to 30 fps [Latger Buffer] |
Up to 30 fps for 200 frames (JPEG/RAW) |
| Autofocus Points |
779 (Phase Detection and Contrast Detection) |
779 (Phase Detection and Contrast Detection) |
| Metering Modes |
Center-Weighted, Highlight Weighted, Multi-Zone, Spot |
Center-Weighted, Highlight Weighted, Multiple, Spot |
| Aspect Ratios |
3:2, 16:9, 17:9 |
1:1, 2:1, 3:2, 4:3, 16:9, 65:24 |
| Image Formats |
DNG, JPEG |
JPEG, RAW |
| Bit Depth |
14-Bit |
14-Bit |
| White Balance |
Auto, Cloudy, Color Temp, Daylight, Flash, Fluorescent (Cool/Warm), Manual, Shade, Tungsten |
AWB, Cloudy, Color Temp, Daylight, Flash, Incandescent, Shade, Custom (4 presets) |
Conclusion: In our table, we can see that there is a kind of negligible difference between these two. But if you consider the Leica body, the superior electronic viewfinder, the higher-resolution display screen, and budget doesn’t matter to you, then for sure, the Leica SL3-S is a great camera between the two. However, if you love to save $2,000, then the S5IIx is the best.
The alternatives of the Leica SL3-S camera
The best alternatives to the Leica SL3-S camera in this price range are the Nikon Z8 camera and the Canon R5. These are some of the best cameras available. Specification-wise, these are far better than the Leica SL3-S, and you have to pay almost a similar or a bit less price compared to the two.
3. Video Comparison
| Feature |
Leica SL3-S |
Panasonic S5IIx |
| Max Resolution |
UHD 6K (5888 x 3312) at 23.98/25/29.97 fps |
5.9K (5952 x 3968) at 23.98/24.00/25/29.97 fps |
| Video Formats |
H.264/H.265 Long GOP, MP4 (4:2:0 8/10-Bit), ProRes 4:2:2 |
H.264/H.265, MOV/MP4, ProRes 4:2:2/4:2:0 8/10-Bit |
| External Recording |
4:2:2 12-Bit via HDMI |
4:2:212-Bit via HDMI |
| Frame Rates |
Up to UHD 4K (3840 x 2160) at 59.94 fps |
Up to UHD 4K (3840 x 2160) at 59.94 fps |
| Slow Motion |
Slow Motion Only |
Yes |
| Gamma Curve |
Rec709, Rec2020 |
Panasonic V-Gamut, V-Log |
| Built-In Microphone |
Stereo |
Stereo |
| Audio Formats |
AAC, LPCM |
MOV: LPCM 24-Bit, MP4: AAC 16-Bit |
| Recording Limit |
No |
No |
| IP Streaming |
No |
RTP, RTSP (up to 4K at 25 Mb/s) |
| Bitrate |
Not specified |
Up to 800 Mbps |
| Heat Management |
Not specified |
Active Cooling |
| Autofocus in Video |
Phase Detection |
Phase Detection with AI Tracking |
| HDMI Port |
Full-Size HDMI |
Full-Size HDMI 2.1 |
| Timecode Support |
No |
Yes |
| Vertical Video Support |
Yes |
Yes |
Conclusion: Both cameras offer 6k at 30fps, 4k 30FPS uncropped and 4k60fps with crop [1.5x]. Again, in the video core specification part, you can see there is very little difference to spot. Other than that, I prefer the Panasonic S5 series camera’s V-Log. At the same time, we also have an active cooling mechanism that prevents it from overheating. So, more or less, for video core specification-wise, the Panasonic S5IIx camera is more recommended.
Also see – Sony FX30 vs Panasonic S5 IIX
By admin, on November 18th, 2024
Let’s Compare the Sony ZV-E10 II and the Nikon Z50 II. The big question is, which one is better for your own personal requirements and your budget too? So, we are going to compare the major differences between the two, and you have to keep your requirements in mind. Every time we compare the major specs of the cameras, here we are also analyzing that particular spec in our conclusion and verdict part. Jump in and find out the best camera for you!
Nikon Z50 II vs Canon R10 | Nikon Z50 II vs Sony A6700
Design and Build
| Feature |
Nikon Z50 II |
Sony ZV-E10 II |
| Lens Mount |
Nikon Z |
Sony E |
| Body Material |
Magnesium Alloy |
Polycarbonate with Metal Components |
| Weight (With Battery) |
Approx. 450 g |
377 g |
| Dimensions (W x H x D) |
126.5 x 93.5 x 60 mm |
114.8 x 67.5 x 54.2 mm |
| Monitor Display |
3.2″ 1.04M-Dot Tilting Touchscreen LCD |
3.0″ 1.03M-Dot Articulating Touchscreen LCD |
| Viewfinder |
0.39″ OLED, 2.36M-Dot, 100% coverage |
No Viewfinder |
| Weather-Sealing |
Yes |
No |
| Built-In ND Filter |
No |
No |
| Hot Shoe Mount |
Yes |
Yes (Multi-Interface Shoe for Accessories) |
Design – Compact Creator vs Rugged Explore
These two cameras are completely different specifically design-wise. The Sony ZV-E10 Mark II camera does have a small hand grip for shooting occasionally, but as we know since it belongs to the SONY ZV Series has been designed for content creation and cinematography. It has an ultra-compact body with fewer controls. The camera also doesn’t have any weather sealing over it neither the EVF.
The Nikon Z50 Mark II HYBRID camera has an electronic viewfinder with 1000 nits brightness. It also has a very deep and redesigned hand grip, even better than its predecessor. At the same time, the body is weather-sealed, so you can shoot in uncontrolled light environments without any issues.
Best Camera as per Design Conclusion / Verdict
For portability, flexibility, and easier controls, the Sony ZV-E10 II leads. Again, for durability, extensive manual controls, and outdoor adventure, it is recommended to use the Nikon Z50 II camera.
Imaging Capabilities
| Feature |
Nikon Z50 II |
Sony ZV-E10 II |
| Sensor Type and Size |
APS-C CMOS, 23.5 x 15.7 mm |
APS-C CMOS, 23.3 x 15.5 mm |
| Resolution |
20.9 MP |
26 MP |
| ISO Sensitivity (Photo) |
100-51,200 (Expandable to 204,800) |
100-32,000 (Expandable to 50-102,400) |
| Continuous Shooting Speed |
11 fps 200 RAW/ 15 fps / 30 Fps Jpeg |
Up to 11 fps for 59 RAW / 1000 JPEG Frames |
| Autofocus Points (Photo) |
209 Phase-Detection Points |
759 Phase-Detection Points |
| Low-Light AF Sensitivity |
-9 EV |
-3 EV |
| Image Stabilization |
VR for Video only |
Digital + GYRO (Video Only) |
| Aspect Ratios Available |
3:2, 16:9 |
3:2, 16:9 |
| Image File Formats |
JPEG, NEF (RAW) |
JPEG, HEIF, Raw |
High Resolution vs Low Light Sensitivity
As we know, the Sony ZV-E10 II camera features a 26-megapixel CMOS sensor, while the Nikon Z50 II has a 20.9-megapixel sensor. Due to the resolution difference, the Sony ZV-E10 II camera captures more detail at the base ISO range starting from ISO 100-400, and it’s more recommended for landscape photography, portraits, and product shots where one wants to harness the maximum amount of detail possible from a camera.
On the other hand, we have the Nikon Z50 II camera with a 20.9-megapixel sensor. Due to the lower resolution, we have large photodiodes inside this camera, which enables more incoming light to be absorbed, resulting in cleaner images at higher ISOs. For example, if you are shooting at ISO 1600 or 3200, the Z50 II camera will provide you with cleaner images compared to he compatitor.
Sensor Image Quality – Conclusion / Verdict
When shooting in uncontrolled light environments, it is highly recommended that you get the Nikon Z50 II camera, specifically when you are shooting wildlife where your subject can be at any place or time, then it’s recommended to have cameras like Z50 II that can capture better details or images at higher ISO ranges.
Autofocus: AI Precision vs Autofocus Consistency
Sony ZV-E10 II camera features 759 phase-detection autofocus points. Not only does the number of autofocus points matter, but the autofocus algorithm of the Sony ZV-E10 II camera is powered by an advanced AI AF algorithm, so it enhances the overall autofocus experience 2x better than what it was in the Sony A6400 camera.
And Nikon Z50 Mark II also arrives with an upgraded autofocus system. As per Nikon’s press text, the Z50 Mark II camera uses the same autofocus algorithm that we have seen in the Nikon Z8 camera. Having said that, it’s a major improvement in Nikon APS-C lineup, and without a doubt, you can feel it. For example, even at 30 frames per second when you are using Nikon Z50 II at C30 mode, the camera does autofocus and auto-exposure calculation in every frame. That is a clear indication of how fast the Z50 Mark II autofocus calculation has now become.
The good thing about Nikon Z50 Mark II is, apart from improved autofocus modes, the camera does autofocus sensitivity up to -9 EV, whereas in Sony it’s limited to -3 to -4 EV depending upon the type of lenses you are using in both the cameras.
30 FPS Continuous shooting speed, the Nikon Z50 II camera features continuous shooting upto 30 FPS as well as Pre-Brust modes of 0.35ses, .05 Ses, and 1.0 Sec that captures a MAX of 30 Jpegs before you hit the shutter, one of the only cameras that offer pre-burst mode in this price segment.
Best AutoFocus – Conclusion / Verdict
Now, even though the Z50 II autofocus is much improved, for action-packed VIDEOS, it is highly recommended to use the Sony ZV-E10 Mark II camera 😉 . But for shooting action-packed images at higher frame rates, Z50 is the best option where you have multiple options like shooting with a mechanical shutter or electronic, at the very same time, the camera does autofocus and auto-exposure calculation all the way, even at 30 fps. That’s the Nikon Z50 II recommended for shooting action-packed images when we have these two options in front.
Electronic Stabilization vs Gyro
None of the cameras has Sensor-Shift IS [No Mechnical], The Sony ZV-E10 II camera uses GYRO which also includes active image stabilization. The Active IS works flawlessly but needs wide lenses to crop and apply the steb. If you have that much wider better to use GYRO. Nikon Z50 Mark II camera uses electronic stabilization in video mode [E-VR], which is of course not as good as we have in the Sony ZV-E10 II, but yeah, it is effective to some extent.
Best Camera for Handheld Shooting – Conclusion / Verdict
Since none of them have any kind of mechanical stabilization inside them, and if you talk about electronic image stabilization, then Sony excels while using the active mode as well as an option to use gyro-based image stabilization.
Video Capabilities
| Feature |
Nikon Z50 II |
Sony ZV-E10 II |
| Internal Recording Modes |
H.264/H.265 8/10-Bit |
XAVC HS/S 4:2:2 10-Bit, XAVC S 8-Bit, XAVC S-I 10-Bit |
Max 4K Res.
|
UHD 4K 60p 1.5X Crop |
UHD 4K 60p 1.04X Crop |
| High-Speed Recording |
1920 x 1080 up to 120 fps |
1080p up to 240 fps |
| Recording Limit |
Approx. 121 mins |
No recording limit |
| Gamma Profiles |
N Log |
S-Cinetone, S-Log3 |
Luts
|
RED-Luts |
Picture Profiles |
| Built-In Microphone |
Mono |
Stereo |
| Audio Inputs and Outputs |
Microphone and Headphone |
Microphone input, Headphone output |
| Focus Points (Video) |
209 Phase-Detection Points |
495 Phase-Detection Points |
Color Science: Grading Playground vs. Ready-to-Use Output
Sony ZV-E10 II camera is built for cinematic video and content creation purposes. It supports 4K video recording up to 60 frames per second with a negligible crop of 1.03x. At the same time, you can record your videos in 10-bit 4:2:2 internally. It also supports professional-grade S-Log3 and S-Cinetone, which professionals generally prefer to use.
The Sony ZV-E10 II camera also features a gyro-based image stabilization system backed by Active Mode, so depending on the type of lens you have, you can utilize any of these image stabilization methods.
Yes, we do have Product Showcase Mode and Active Framing, ideal for content creators shooting solo content. Additionally, the battery life and ultra-compact body make it highly portable.
Nikon Z50 II camera features 4K 60p recording with a 1.5x crop, which may or may not suit many professionals out there. However, the good news is that the Nikon Z50 II features natural color science, inspired by RED camera makers. The RED-like color science is now available in the Z50 II camera. Additionally, the camera also supports waveform function, which professionals will love.
If you make talking-head videos while sitting in your room, you can use the newly developed Product Review Mode or Product Showcase Mode of the Nikon camera. However, the image stabilization is not as effective as that of Sony’s.
If you’re a professional cinematographer, short filmmaker, or story trailer, you’ll appreciate the RED-like color science present in the Z50 II. Despite the crop in 4K 60p, if you’re okay with it, you’ll benefit from waveform support, which is highly essential for professional storytelling.
The Sony ZV-E10 II camera, designed for video creation, includes all the bells and whistles you’d wish for in a professional video camera.
Power and Connectivity
| Feature |
Nikon Z50 II |
Sony ZV-E10 II |
| Battery Type |
EN-EL25a, Approx. 320 Shots |
NP-FZ100, Approx. 610 Shots |
| USB-C for Power/Charging |
Yes |
Yes |
| Media/Memory Card Slot |
Single SD Slot (UHS-II) |
Single SD Slot (UHS-II) |
| Wireless |
Wi-Fi, Bluetooth |
Wi-Fi (2.4/5 GHz), Bluetooth 4.2 |
| Mobile App Compatibility |
SnapBridge |
Creators’ App (Android & iOS) |
Nikon Z50 Mark II: Weather-Sealed BODY and Low-Light Sensor
In conclusion, the Sony ZV-E10 II camera and the Nikon Z50 Mark 2 camera are made for different types of users. If you look carefully, without a doubt, the Nikon Z50 Mark 2 camera has been made with a deep hand grip, EVF and a rugged body. The camera also features excellent low-light performance with its 20.9 MP sensor and, without the option of an optical low-pass filter, it captures decent images at base ISO. This makes it an ideal camera for wildlife photography, event photography, and even travel photography where you have a completely uncontrolled set of environments and lights.
Sony ZV-E10 II: Best for HANDHELD Content Creators
The Sony ZV-E10 II camera is a content creator’s powerhouse that offers 4K 60 FPS recording, which is almost uncropped since it has only a 1.03x crop, which is unnoticeable. You can record 10-bit videos internally, powered by S-Log3 and S-Cinetone. One of the best things about the Sony camera is that you are getting active image stabilization backed by gyro-based stabilization, ideal for those who love to shoot their content on the go. It will provide completely stable, high-quality footage. Additional features include product showcase mode, active framing, and a three-capsule microphone to record high-quality audio directly in the camera. More or less, it is highly recommended for content creators.
Sony ZV-E10 II: For Photography?
Yes, you can occasionally use the ZV-E10 II camera for photography purposes to get a resolution advantage, but it is highly recommended that you use this camera with proper lighting conditions to extract the maximum amount of detail possible.
Nikon Z50 Mark II: Cinematographers and StoryTellers
The Nikon Z50 Mark II camera does have some exceptional advantages in video recording modes that should not be overlooked. It captures clean and noise-free videos at higher ISO levels and has been inspired by RED cinema profiles. Moreover, it also features waveform capability with a weather-sealed body. So if you are a short film storyteller or beginner cinematographer, you should consider these factors before getting your first camera for professional cinematography purposes.
Sony ZV-E10 II from B&H Store | Amazon.com
Sony ZV-E10 II Recommended for:
- Casual Clicks
- Wedding Video
- Vlogging / YouTube Content Creation
- Solo Content Creation (Active Framing & Product Showcase Mode)
- Cinematic SOLO Videography (with S-Log3 & S-Cinetone)
- Casual Travel Videography
- Compact, On-the-Go Shooting
Get a Nikon Z50 Mark II camera from the B&H Store | Amazon.com
Nikon Z50 II Recommended for:
- Low-Light Photography
- Wildlife Photography
- Wedding Photography
- Event Photography (due to clean high ISO performance)
- Documentary Videography
- Cinematic Filmmaking (low light, RED-inspired color science)
- Rugged Outdoor Photography (weather-sealed body)
- Travel Photography in Challenging Environments
- High ISO Videography
- Professional Video Shoots (Waveform & RED LUTs)
Support us – Use or affiliate link Amazon.com | B&H Store for the next purchase u make – it helps us 🙂
Follow us on our social pages FACEBOOK | TWITTER | INSTAGRAM to get live Camera News +
By admin, on November 9th, 2024
Let us compare the Nikon Z50 II with the Canon R10 camera. Let’s explore the main differences between these two cameras and find out which one is the best for photographers and which one is best for shooting videos. In the comparison table below, we have highlighted the differences in design, and we have created two separate tables dedicated to photography and videography features. So let’s find out the best camera between these two for your specific needs and budget.
1. Design Comparison
| Feature |
Nikon Z50 II |
Canon R10 |
| Body Dimensions |
5 x 3.8 x 2.6″ / 127 x 96.8 x 66.5 mm |
4.8 x 3.5 x 3.3″ / 122.5 x 87.8 x 83.4 mm |
| Weight |
495 g (Body Only) |
382.2 g (Body Only) |
| Lens Mount |
Nikon Z |
Canon RF |
| Display |
3.2″ Tilting Touchscreen LCD, 1,040,000 Dot |
3.0″ Free-Angle Tilting Touchscreen LCD, 1,040,000 Dot |
| EVF Type |
Built-In Electronic (OLED), 0.39″, 2,360,000 Dot – 1000 NITS Brightness |
Built-In Electronic (OLED), 2,360,000 Dot |
| Battery Type |
EN-EL25a or EN-EL25, approx. 230 shots |
LP-E17, approx. 430 shots |
| Ports |
USB-C Data & Power, Micro-HDMI, Mic & Headphone Jacks |
USB-C, Micro-HDMI, Mic Jack |
| Available Lenses |
Nikon Z DX and FX lenses |
Canon RF-S and RF lenses |
2. Photographic Feature Comparison
| Feature |
Nikon Z50 II |
Canon R10 |
Sensor Type
|
BSI CMOS |
FSI CMOS |
| Sensor Size |
23.5 x 15.7 mm (APS-C) |
22.3 x 14.9 mm (APS-C) |
| Effective Resolution |
20.9 Megapixel |
24.2 Megapixel |
| ISO Range (Photo) |
100 to 51,200 (Extended: 100 to 204,800) |
100 to 32,000 (Extended: 100 to 51,200) |
| Shutter Type |
Mechanical Focal Plane, Electronic Rolling |
Mechanical, Electronic Rolling |
| Shutter Speed (Mechanical) |
1/4000 to 900 sec |
1/4000 to 30 sec |
| Bulb Mode |
Yes |
Yes |
| Continuous Shooting (Mech) |
Up to 11 fps at 20.9 MP |
Up to 15 fps at 24.2 MP |
| Continuous Shooting (Elec) |
Up to 30 fps at 20.9 MP (JPEG) |
Up to 23 fps at 24.2 MP |
Pre-Capture Mode
|
1 Sec |
0.5 Sec |
| Autofocus Points |
231 (Phase & Contrast Detection) |
651 (Phase Detection Zones) |
| AF Sensitivity |
-9 to +19 EV |
-4 to +20 EV |
| AF Modes |
Continuous-Servo AF, Full-Time AF, Manual, Single-Servo AF |
Continuous-Servo AF, Manual, Single-Servo AF |
Weather sealed
|
Yes |
No |
Battery Life
|
250 Shots |
450 Shots |
3. Video Comparison
| Feature |
Nikon Z50 II |
Canon R10 |
| Sensor Type |
BSI CMOS |
FSI CMOS |
| Video Resolution & Frame Rates |
UHD 4K (30 fps) Uncropped |
UHD 4K (30 fps) Uncropped |
4k 60 FPS
|
1.5X Cropped |
1.5x Cropped |
Full HD Max Frame rate
|
120 FPS |
100 FPS |
Product showcase mode
|
Yes |
No |
| Video Stabilization |
Digital (Video Only) |
Digital (Video Only) |
| Internal Recording Codec |
H.264/H.265 (8/10-Bit) |
H.264 MP4 4:2:0 8-Bit, H.265 MP4 4:2:2 10-Bit |
| External Recording Codec |
HDMI 4K |
HDMI 1080p |
| HDR/LOG Support |
HDR-HLG, Nikon N-Log |
HDR-PQ |
Support RAW Video
|
Yes, N-Log available |
No, C-Log isn’t there |
| Recording Limit |
Up to 125 minutes |
Upto 120 Mins |
| Audio Recording |
Stereo, 24-Bit 48 kHz LPCM or 16-Bit AAC |
Stereo, 2-Channel AAC |
Conclusion Verdict
The Nikon Z50 II camera now has much-improved autofocus and also a low-light sensor, which helps to extract the maximum amount of detail possible in uncontrolled lighting environments or in any outdoor location. For wedding and event photography, we recommend you to go with Nikon Z50 II
Now, for sports and wildlife, it depends on which camera you like to buy since both are very capable. But again, due to the presence of a BSI CMOS sensor, the Z50 Mark II camera will perform better in uncontrolled lighting environments, specifically when you are using this camera for wildlife or bird photography. However, for sports events, you can take the Canon R10 with you when there is no big issue with light, as sports events generally happen during daylight. So, you may utilize the R10, and also, in sports events, you may require more reliable autofocus tracking, which is present in the Canon R10 alongside its slightly faster 15 fps mechanical shutter.
For day-to-day usage and street photography, I am going to recommend the Nikon Z50 Mark II camera. Due to the nature of its sensor and construction, the camera is able to capture clear shots and also has high low-light autofocus sensitivity compared to the R10. So more or less, for uncontrolled lighting environments of any type, the Nikon Z50 Mark II is more recommended. 165
Get a Nikon Z50 Mark II camera from the B&H Store | Amazon.com
Canon R10 – Camera body $879 [B&H Store] [Amazon.com] |
| Type of Photography/Video |
Recommended Camera |
| Wedding and Event Photography |
Nikon Z50 II
Due to its improved autofocus, low-light sensor, and availability of third-large amount party lenses , we recommend you to go with Nikon Z50 II |
| Wildlife and Bird Photography |
Nikon Z50 II
The BSI CMOS sensor in the Z50 II performs well in low-light and uncontrolled lighting, which is often required in wildlife photography. + You get AF sensitivity down to – 9 FV and upscaled 3d AI AF tracking. |
| Sports Photography (Daylight Events) |
Canon R10
Reliable autofocus tracking and slightly faster 15 fps mechanical shutter make the R10 a strong choice for sports events in daylight conditions. |
| Everyday Use and Street Photography |
Nikon Z50 II
Excellent low-light autofocus sensitivity and sensor design allow the Z50 II to capture clear shots in diverse lighting, making it versatile for daily use. |
| General Video Needs |
Canon R10 (for daylight, faster autofocus)
OR Nikon Z50 II (for low-light video) |
Nikon Z50 II Image Quality Test
Nikon Z30 / Zfc Image samples have been taken here since Nikon Z50 II and Zfc, both of them share the same sensor, so image quality is expected to remain exactly same as of the Nikon Z50 Mark II. Image credit dpreview.com
In the Image below we have compared the Nikon Z30 vs Canon R10 Images at ISO 25600, in RAW mode, as you can see the details are much preserved in Nikon Z50 II file
Next comparison Even in the JPEG comparison below you can see that Nikon is preserving more details compared to the Canon R10 FSI CMOS sensor.
During the base ISO test we can see the letters in the Nikon Z50 II are more clearly visible than those of the Canon R10, despite having higher resolution Canon isn’t able to extract the amount of details they should at the base ISO range
In the JPEG Mode, the performance of the Canon R10 Camera is much improved which may be due to JPEG filters the Nikon Z30 sample at base ISO losing a bit of details which was visible in the RAW Mode.
Verdict / Conclusion Image Quality
In terms of image quality, the Nikon Z50 II performs better than the Canon R10 at higher ISO settings, particularly when shooting in RAW mode. The Nikon Z50 II (or Z30) tends to capture more details at higher ISOs due to its 20MP sensor and lack of a low-pass filter, which helps to maintain fine textures.
However, at base ISO, when shooting in JPEG, the Canon R10 may show slightly more detail due to its higher 24MP resolution. But if you’re shooting in RAW at base ISO, the Nikon cameras can still provide a slightly clearer picture due to the low-pass-less design, which can enhance sharpness. Overall, for detail preservation, the Nikon Z50 II’s 20MP sensor has a slight edge, especially for those who prioritize high ISO performance and RAW shooting.
Support us – Use or affiliate link Amazon.com | B&H Store for the next purchase u make – it helps us
Follow us on our social pages FACEBOOK | TWITTER | INSTAGRAM to get live Camera News +
By admin, on October 15th, 2024
Let’s compare the Fuji X-M5 versus the Sony A6700 camera. We have compared the photographic & videography features in a separate table, so you can easily understand which camera is best for you.
If you are a photographer, which camera should you buy? Again, if you are a content creator, videographer, or wedding filmmaker, which camera should you choose?
Take a look at the specification comparison table below, where we have highlighted the major differences between the two cameras. They also have some similarities, but the good thing is that the Fuji X-M5 camera is able not only to compete but also to uplift the competition bar by upscaling the core specifications.
Fuji X-M5 vs Sony A6700 – 15 Major Differences for Photographers
| Feature |
Fuji X-M5 |
Sony A6700 |
| Sensor Resolution |
26.1 MP APS-C CMOS |
26 MP APS-C Exmor R BSI CMOS |
| Image Processor |
X-Processor 5 |
BIONZ XR |
| ISO Range (Photography) |
160 to 12,800 (Extended: 80 to 51,200) |
100 to 32,000 (Extended: 50 to 102,400) |
| Autofocus Points (Photo) |
425 Phase Detection Points |
759 Phase Detection Points |
| Autofocus Sensitivity |
-7 EV |
-3 EV |
| Continuous Shooting |
Up to 30 fps (Electronic, cropped) |
Up to 11 fps (Mechanical & Electronic) |
| Viewfinder |
No Viewfinder |
2.36M-dot OLED Viewfinder |
| Shutter Speed (Mechanical) |
1/4000 to 30 seconds |
1/8000 to 30 seconds |
| Mechanical Shutter |
Yes |
Yes |
| Image Stabilization |
NA |
5-Axis In-Body Image Stabilization (IBIS) |
| Sensor Type |
Standard CMOS |
Backside Illuminated (BSI) CMOS |
| Weather Sealing |
Yes (Dust & Water Resistant) |
Yes (Dust & Moisture Resistant) |
| Battery Life (Stills) |
Approx. 460 shots |
Approx. 570 shots |
| Weight |
355g (Body Only) |
493g (Body Only) |
| Memory Card Slot |
Single SD UHS-I Slot |
Single SD UHS-II Slot + CFexpress Type A |
Quick Analysis of Specification Differences between the two
The core specifications of the Fuji X-M5 camera look very impressive when compared with the Sony A6700 camera.
If you are a photographer, then of course you will miss the sensor-shift image stabilization in the Fuji X-M5, which is present in the Sony A6700.
Having image stabilization in your camera is really important if you shoot images in low-light environments. The image sensor compensates for hand movements even when you are using a slow shutter speed, resulting in neat and clean images.
Another feature that will help the Sony A6700 camera is the high ISO range, which is expandable from 50 up to 102400.
But wait, we still have some significant differences that might affect your choice. Another big difference for photographers to consider is the continuous shooting speed. If you don’t want any rolling shutter effect visible in your images, you have to use the mechanical shutter, as the electronic shutter can cause rolling shutter effects, especially with non-stacked sensors.
Autofocus Sensitivity and Tracking
Finally, let’s talk about the autofocusing systems of both cameras. We have seen the autofocus sensitivity difference between the two. If you compare them, the Fuji X-M5 camera looks very impressive with -7 EV autofocus sensitivity against the A6700 camera, which has -3 EV autofocus sensitivity. But this autofocus sensitivity only works once to acquire the autofocus point in extremely low-light situations.
Now, let’s consider a situation where quick moment-to-moment focus is needed. In this case, the Fuji X-M5 may focus more quickly compared to the A6700, due to its AF sensitivity. However, when we talk about autofocus tracking performance, due to the higher number of phase-detect autofocus points present in the Sony sensor—approximately 759 compared to Fuji’s 425—the tracking performance of the Sony A6700 sensor will be better than the X-M5.
So, we have two differences here. First, autofocus acquisition is better in the Fuji, but at the same time, the autofocus tracking performance is better in the Sony. Generally, most autofocus modes rely on the tracking performance of the camera, not on the acquisition part, so I would give a slight advantage to Sony in terms of tracking performance.
Design and Battery Life
Finally, let’s talk about the design part of both cameras. The Sony A6700 camera hand grip is deeper and much better compared to the Fuji X-M5. At the same time, we have a dedicated OLED viewfinder in the body of the Sony A6700 camera, which helps photographers who are used to using optical viewfinders from DSLRs. So, more or less, if we talk about ease of use and digital body design, the A6700 camera is more user-friendly.
At the same time, if we talk about battery backup, the Sony offers a bigger battery, resulting in more shots per charge—approximately 570+, whereas in Fuji, you are getting around 460. So yes, we do have some differences.
Conclusion: The best camera for photographer
should you go with the Fuji X-M5 or the Sony A6700? We get some extra features from inside to out with the Sony A6700 camera. Have a look:
The positive features of the Sony A6700 include the presence of a sensor-shift image stabilization system, which helps capture clear images in low-light environments. At the same time, the wide ISO range, starting from 50, is completely absent in the Fuji X-M5. Additionally, the A6700 offers a bigger battery life, which makes it a better option for professional photographers.
Not only that, but we also have a very large range of E-mount lenses from Sigma, Tamron, and many other brands. Although the Fuji X-mount is also open, it is not as big or broad as the E-mount at the moment, even though there are many options in X-mount.
Compared to the X-M5, we do see some advantages like autofocus sensitivity and continuous shooting speed. So, if you really want a camera with fast continuous shooting speed and don’t care much about the ISO range, image stabilization system, battery grip, or battery life, then the X-M5 might be a good option. However, for a photographer, we highly recommend the Sony A6700.
Fuji X-M5 vs Sony A6700 – 15 Major Video-Related Differences
| Feature |
Fuji X-M5 |
Sony A6700 |
| MAX Video Resolution |
6.2K up to 30 fps |
4K up to 120 fps |
| Slow-Motion Video |
1080p at 240 fps |
4K at 120 fps, FHD at 240 fps |
| Video Codec |
H.264/H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264/H.265 (HEVC), XAVC S-I |
| Video Bitrate |
400 Mb/s |
600 Mb/s |
| Video Recording Limit |
50 minutes in 4K |
No Recording Limit |
| Log Profiles |
F-Log, F-Log 2 |
S-Log 3, S-Cinetone |
| Autofocus Points (Video) |
425 Phase Detection Points |
759 Phase Detection Points |
| Autofocus Features |
Face/Eye Detection |
Real-time Tracking, Eye AF for Video, AI framing |
| External Recording |
4:2:2 10-bit via HDMI |
4:2:2 10-bit via HDMI |
| Viewfinder for Video |
No EVF |
Yes, 2.36M-dot OLED Viewfinder |
| Display Type |
3-Way Tilting LCD |
Fully Articulating LCD |
| Video Stabilization |
Electronic |
5-Axis IBIS + Active Mode for Video + Gyro |
| Audio Inputs |
3.5mm Mic Jack, 3.5mm Headphone Jack |
3.5mm Mic Jack, 3.5mm Headphone Jack |
| Mobile Streaming |
No |
Yes (IP Streaming 4K) |
video core specifications
Let’s compare the video core specifications between the Fuji X-M5 and the Sony A6700 cameras.
We have an open gate option in the Fuji X-M5, which videographers will love, especially for professional filmmaking, allowing them to decide the format and ratio for an entire scene. It’s better to record in open gate. In addition, we have options like Full HD mode at 240 frames per second for capturing slow-motion videos.
However, if you compare the X-M5’s features against the Sony A6700, you will miss the higher-resolution open gate mode. But aside from that, the Sony A6700 offers 4K @ 120 frames per second and can also record Full HD videos at 240 frames per second. The bitrate is approximately 600 Mbps, which is better than the X-M5’s 400 Mbps, even though Fuji offers a 6.2K open gate recording option.
A higher bitrate means more color information, and this will definitely help Sony users a bit more. In addition, we have a dedicated AI chip in the Sony A6700, which enhances autofocus tracking performance in video mode, including AI-based auto framing.
The good news is that Fuji is also improving their autofocus modes in the new X-M5 camera. Similar to Sony, they have introduced a product feature mode in the X-M5, showing Fuji is slowly trying to compete with Sony’s features in the A6700 camera.
Aside from all these features, the Sony A6700 has a 2.36-million-dot electronic viewfinder, which may not directly help with filmmaking, but is still a useful feature. However, the biggest factor is the presence of a sensor-shift image stabilization system.
With sensor-shift image stabilization, we can use active mode in video on the Sony camera to achieve smooth and stable footage. Sony also offers a gyro-based image stabilization system, which can smooth out footage like a GoPro when processed with special software.
Conclusion – Best Camera for Video
When you compare all these features, the Sony A6700 looks more appealing. However, if you are a Filmmakers (Independent or Short Films) prefer the open-gate recording format, you can go with the Fuji X-M5. But if you’re asking which one is more usable and practical camera, for
- For Wedding Cinematographers
- For Traditional Videographers (Corporate, Documentaries):
- For Content Creators
The Sony A6700 is more usable, with its 4K 120 FPS mode, advanced autofocus tracking with a dedicated AI chip, and hybrid image stabilization, which is the better option. The Sony A6700 simply offers a more advanced set of features.
Final Recommendations:
- Fuji X-M5 is recommended for filmmakers who need open gate recording and prefer high-resolution control.
- Sony A6700 is a all-in-one all-rounder for content creators, wedding cinematographers, and traditional videographers, features advanced autofocus, 4K 120 FPS, and Excellent stabilization features.
Fuji X-M5 Price
Fujifilm X-M5 Body: £799 / €899- B&H Store
Fujifilm X-M5 + XC 15-45 Kit: £899 / €999 – B&H Store
Sony A6700 Price
Sony A6700 Body: $1398 B&H Store | Amazon.com
Sony A6700 with Kit Lens: $1498 – B&H Store and Amazon.com
Support us – Use or affiliate link Amazon.com | B&H Store for the next purchase u make – it helps us
By admin, on November 1st, 2022
Both of the Fuji Cameras feature the latest X-Processor 5 engine and a 5th-gen 40MP X-Trans BSI APS-C sensor, despite having the same sensor and image processor we do have some differences in the core specs of both cameras.
|
|
|
| Camera |
FUJI X-T5 |
FUJI X-H2 |
| Sensor Type |
Effective: 40.2 Megapixel (6240 x 4160) |
Effective: 40.2 Megapixel |
| Crop Factor |
23.5 x 15.6 mm (APS-C) CMOS |
23.5 x 15.6 mm (APS-C) CMOS |
| Image Stabilization |
1.5x |
1.5x |
| Built-In ND Filter |
Sensor-Shift, 5-Axis |
Sensor-Shift, 5-Axis |
| Capture Type |
None |
None |
|
Stills & Video |
Stills & Video |
The Autofocus specification of both cameras is exactly similar to each other since we have the same sensor and image processor here. So, more or less the image quality of the camera and the AF performance of both are expected to remain the same.
| |
FUJI X-T5 |
FUJI X-H2 |
| Focus Type |
Auto and Manual Focus |
Auto and Manual Focus |
| Focus Mode |
Continuous-Servo AF, Manual Focus, Single-Servo AF |
Continuous-Servo AF, Manual Focus, Single-Servo AF |
| Autofocus Points |
Photo, Video
Contrast Detection, Phase Detection: 425 |
Photo, Video
Contrast Detection, Phase Detection: 425 |
| Built-In Flash |
No |
No |
| Flash Modes |
Auto, Commander, First-Curtain Sync, Manual, Off, Second-Curtain Sync, TTL Auto |
Auto, Commander, First-Curtain Sync, Manual, Off, Second-Curtain Sync, TTL Auto |
| Maximum Sync Speed |
250 Second |
250 Second |
| External Flash Connection |
Hot Shoe, PC Terminal |
Hot Shoe, PC Terminal |
As you can see we have a slightly better base ISO range in the Fuji X-H2 camera. Although the extent ISO range of both cameras remains the same.
- X-H2 125 to 12,800 in Manual, Auto Mode (Extended: 80 to 51,200)
- X-T5 – 160 to 12,800 in Auto Mode (Extended: 80 to 51,200)
| |
FUJI X-T5 |
FUJI X-H2 |
| Shutter Type |
Electronic Shutter, Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter |
Electronic Shutter, Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter |
| Shutter Speed |
Mechanical Shutter
1/8000 to 900 Seconds in Manual Mode
1/8000 to 900 Seconds in Shutter Priority Mode
1/8000 to 30 Seconds in Aperture Priority Mode
1/8000 to 4 Seconds in Program Mode
Up to 60 Minutes in Bulb Mode
Electronic Shutter
1/32000 to 900 Seconds in Manual Mode
1/32000 to 900 Seconds in Shutter Priority Mode
Electronic Front Curtain Shutter
1/8000 to 900 Seconds in Manual
Electronic Shutter
1/8000 to 1/4 Second in Movie Mode |
Mechanical Shutter
1/8000 to 4 Seconds in Program Mode
1/8000 to 30 Seconds in Aperture Priority Mode
1/8000 to 15 Minutes in Manual Mode
Up to 60 Minutes in Bulb Mode
Electronic Shutter
1/8000 to 4 Seconds in Program Mode
1/8000 to 30 Seconds in Aperture Priority Mode
1/8000 to 15 Minutes in Manual Mode
Fixed 1 Second in Bulb Mode |
| Bulb/Time Mode |
Bulb Mode |
Bulb Mode |
| ISO Sensitivity |
Photo
160 to 12,800 in Auto Mode (Extended: 80 to 51,200)
Video
160 to 12,800 in Auto Mode (Extended: 160 to 25,600) |
Photo
125 to 12,800 in Manual, Auto Mode (Extended: 80 to 51,200)
Video
125 to 12,800 in Manual, Auto Mode (Extended: 80 to 25,600) |
| Metering Method |
Average, Center-Weighted Average, Multiple, Spot |
Average, Center-Weighted Average, Multi-Zone, Spot |
| Exposure Modes |
Aperture Priority, Manual, Program, Shutter Priority |
Aperture Priority, Auto, Manual, Program, Shutter Priority |
| Exposure Compensation |
-5 to +5 EV (1/3 EV Steps) |
-5 to +5 EV (1/3 EV Steps) |
| Continuous Shooting |
Mechanical Shutter
Mechanical Shutter Approx. 15fps (JPEG: 119frames,Compressed RAW:39 frames, Lossless Compressed RAW 22 frames, Uncompressed RAW: 19frames, Compressed RAW + JPEG 27 frames)
Mechanical Shutter Approx. 10fps (JPEG: 1000+ frames,Compressed RAW: 56 frames, Lossless Compressed RAW 29 frames, Uncompressed RAW: 19 frames, Compressed RAW + JPEG: 34 frames)
Electronic Shutter
Electronic Shutter Approx. 20fps (1.29x Crop) (JPEG: 16frames,Compressed RAW: 72, Lossless Compressed RAW 41, Uncompressed RAW: 37 frames, Uncompressed RAW + JPEG: 23 frames)
Electronic Shutter Approx. 13fps (1.29x Crop) (JPEG: 1000+ frames,Compressed RAW: 104, Lossless Compressed RAW: 53, Uncompressed RAW: 23 frames, Compressed RAW + JPEG: 56, Lossless compressed RAW + JPEG: 44, Uncompressed RAW + JPEG: 23) |
Mechanical Shutter
Up to 15 fps at 26.1 MP for up to 38 Frames (Raw) / 110 Frames (JPEG)
Up to 10 fps at 26.1 MP for up to 44 Frames (Raw) / 164 Frames (JPEG)
Up to 8 fps at 26.1 MP for up to 49 Frames (Raw) / 200 Frames (JPEG)Electronic Shutter
Up to 20 fps at 26.1 MP for up to 36 Frames (Raw) / 79 Frames (JPEG)
Up to 30 fps at 20.9 MP for up to 35 Frames (Raw) / 60 Frames (JPEG)
Up to 20 fps at 20.9 MP for up to 37 Frames (Raw) / 114 Frames (JPEG)
Up to 10 fps at 20.9 MP for up to 48 Frames (Raw) / 500 Frames (JPEG) |
The difference in BASE ISO Range
So, with such a little difference in the base ISO range, we don’t expect much difference in the performance of both cameras. Yes, under LAB TEST results we may see some difference in DR due to the minor difference we have in the base ISO range, but in real-world usage, we won’t be able to spot any difference.
Buffer Limitation
Fuji X-T5 is able to save only 119 Jpeg in single bursts whereas the Fuji X-H2 camera is able to save up to 1000+ Jpeg in a single burst. CF CFexpress Type B also missing in the new X-T5.
| |
FUJI X-T5 |
FUJI X-H2 |
| Internal Recording Modes |
H.264/H.265/MOV 10-Bit
6.2K (16:9) – 6240 x3150: 29.97p/ 25p/ 24p/ 23.98p
360Mbps/200Mbps/ 100Mbps/ 50MbpsDCI
4K (17:9) – 4096 x2160: 59.94p/ 50p/ 29.97p/ 25p/ 24p/ 23.98p
360Mbps/ 200Mbps/100Mbps/50Mbps4K (16:9) – 3840 x2160: 59.94p/ 50p/ 29.97p/ 25p/ 24p/ 23.98p
720Mbps/ 360Mbps/ 200Mbps/ 100Mbps/ 50MbpsFull HD (17:9) -2048 x1080: 59.94p/ 50p/ 29.97p/ 25p/ 24p/23.98p
360Mbps/ 200Mbps/ 100Mbps/ 50Mbps |
Raw
7680 x 4320 up to 29.97 fps
MOV/MP4/MPEG-4 AVC/ProRes 422/ProRes 422 HQ/ProRes 422LT
UHD 8K (7680 x 4320) at 23.98/24.00/25/29.97 fps [50 to 720 Mb/s]
MOV/MP4/MPEG-4/ProRes 422/ProRes 422 HQ/ProRes 422LT
6240 x 4160 at 23.98/24.00/25/29.97 fps [50 to 720 Mb/s]
DCI 4K (4096 x 2160) at 23.98/24.00/25/29.97/50/59.94 fps [50 to 720 Mb/s]
UHD 4K (3840 x 2160) at 23.98/24.00/25/29.97/50/59.94 fps [50 to 720 Mb/s]
DCI 2K (2048 x 1080) at23.98/24.00/25/29.9 /50/59.94 fps [50 to 720 Mb/s]
1920 x 1080p at 23.98/24.00/25/29.97/50/59.94/100/119.88/200/239.76 fps [50 to 720 Mb/s] |
Video Limitations of X-T5
The high resolution on the sensor allows the X-H2 to record 8K up to 30p (RAW available). You can also select 6.2K video up to 30p. In 4K, you can work up to 30p with oversampling from 8K, or up to 60p with sub-sampling. In Full HD, the frame rate goes up to 240p with the High-Speed mode. With the Fuji X-T5 camera, you can record Full HD Videos up to 240fps but the MAX Video resolution available here is 6.2K video up to 30p. Undoubtedly the X-H2 is a better video camera with more features compared to X-T5.
No External Fan Support in Fuji X-T5 Camera
If you live in a western country then it’s ok, but in Asian countries where the temp goes really high in the summer season, X-T5 is left with no option to add an external fan to the camera due to the introduction of a tilting screen.
The ports of the camera and display screen are more or less likely to be the same.
| |
FUJI X-T5 |
FUJI X-H2 |
| Media/Memory Card Slot |
Dual Slot: CFexpress Type B (SD Express) |
Dual Slot: CFexpress Type B (SD Express) |
| Video I/O |
1 x HDMI Output |
1 x HDMI Output |
| Audio I/O |
1 x 1/8″ / 3.5 mm TRS Stereo Microphone Input |
1 x 1/8″ / 3.5 mm TRRS Headphone/Mic Input on Camera Body
1 x 1/8″ / 3.5 mm TRRS Headphone/Mic Output on Camera Body |
| Power I/O |
1 x USB-C Input/Output |
1 x USB-C Input/Output |
| Wireless |
Wi-Fi, Bluetooth |
2.4 / 5 GHz Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Bluetooth |
| Global Positioning (GPS, GLONASS, etc.) |
None |
None |
High-Quality Viewfinder
The Fuji X-H2 camera features a HighResolution Viewfinder of 5.76 Million dots, yes the X-H2 features class-leading core specs.
| Type |
Built-In Electronic (OLED) |
Built-In Electronic (OLED) |
| Size |
0.5″ |
0.5″ |
| Resolution |
3,6M-dot OLED electronic |
5.76M-dot OLED electronic |
| Eye Point |
23 mm |
100% |
| Coverage |
100% |
Approx. 0.8x |
| Magnification |
Approx. 0.75x |
-5 to +3 |
yes, u will have a very minimal difference in battery life. X-H2 Features a 720-shot battery life and X-T5 features a 740-shot battery life in ECO mode.
Conclusion: Which camera should you buy Fuji X-H2 or Fuji X-T5
Core specification wise we have very little difference between them and so on the price tag. If spending $200 extra on a camera body isn’t an issue for you, than its better to buy the Fuji X-H2 camera. Since u will get a slightly better base ISO range, Better EVF, and 8K video recording capability.
Get a Fuji X-H2 Camera from B&H Store | Amazon.com
Get Fuji X-T5 Camera from B&H Store | Amazon.com
See more Comparisons – Fuji X-T4 vs Fuji X-T5
By admin, on January 6th, 2020
Get Canon 1DX Mark III camera from Amazon.com | B&H Store
TNC Exclusive – We are the first website to published detailed specification comparison review between the two camera.
Let’s have a specification comparison between the two flagship camera. The long rumored Canon 1DX Mark III camera finally arrived just before 2020 Olympic. Canon Took more than 4 years of time to create a brand new flagship camera and not only that consumers have to spend more than $6000+ to get the new body. In general Canon flagship camera arrives with lot of modifications from inside-out. Now, in this comparison we have compared each and every core specification of the camera to find out the best one.
1. Does Canon 1DX Mark III have new sensor ?
The short answer in no. They are using the same old 20MP CMOS technology they have used in the Canon 1DX Mark II camera. The sensor is redesigned to have better AF performance. So, you will be getting almost same image quality from both the camera.
2. Does Canon 1DX Mark III Have Better Image Quality than Canon 1DX Mark II ?
Slightly better (Upto 1 stop). We are getting slightly better image quality in the new Canon 1DX Mark III camera due to the introduction new Dual-Digic 6 image processor inside the camera we are getting 1 stop more ISO range in extended mode compared to the Canon 1DX Mark II camera. Not only that Canon 1DX Mark III also features new image decoding algorithm and with the help of the that we may notice some betterment in the DR, performance of the camera.
3. Sensor Details Comparison – Canon 1DX Mark III vs Canon 1DX Mark II
| Lens Mount |
Canon EF |
Canon EF |
| Camera Format |
Full-Frame (1x Crop Factor) |
Full-Frame (1x Crop Factor) |
| Pixels |
Actual: 21.5 Megapixel
Effective: 20.2 Megapixel |
Actual: 21.5 Megapixel
Effective: 20.2 Megapixel |
| Maximum Resolution |
5472 x 3648 |
5472 x 3648 |
| Aspect Ratio |
3:2 |
3:2 |
| Sensor Type |
CMOS |
CMOS |
| Sensor Size |
36 x 24 mm |
36 x 24 mm |
| Image File Format |
JPEG, RAW |
JPEG, HEIF, Raw |
| Bit Depth |
14-Bit |
14-Bit |
| Image Stabilization |
None |
None |
Having a 20MP sensor isn’t a bad thing for sports shooter, but not updating it even after 5 years of gap is bad. We do know that Sony is using BSI and Stacked CMOS sensor in their flasghip A7 and A9 cameras. But, in Canon we are still sicked to plain CMOS Tech that’s really embarrassing in 2020. ISO range of the camera extended upto 1 stop in MAX range thanks to the new image processor and image decoding algorithms.
| ISO Sensitivity |
Auto, 100 to 51200 (Extended: 50 to 409600) |
Auto, 100 to 51200 (Extended: 50 to ISO 819200) |
| Shutter Speed |
Electronic Front Curtain Shutter
1/8000 to 30 Seconds
Bulb Mode |
Electronic Front Curtain Shutter
1/8000 to 30 Seconds
Bulb Mode |
| Metering Method |
Evaluative, Partial, Spot |
Evaluative, Partial, Spot |
| Exposure Modes |
Aperture Priority, Manual, Program, Shutter Priority |
Aperture Priority, Manual, Program, Shutter Priority |
| Exposure Compensation |
-5 to +5 EV (1/3, 1/2 EV Steps) |
-5 to +5 EV (1/3, 1/2 EV Steps) |
| Metering Range |
0 to 20 EV |
0 to 20 EV |
| White Balance |
Auto, Cloudy, Color Temperature, Custom, Daylight, Flash, Fluorescent (White), Shade, Tungsten |
Auto, Cloudy, Color Temperature, Custom, Daylight, Flash, Fluorescent (White), Shade, Tungsten |
| Continuous Shooting |
Up to 14 fps at 20.2 MP for up to 170 Exposures (Raw) |
Up to 20 fps at 20.2 MP for up to 1000+ Exposures (Raw) |
| Interval Recording |
No |
No |
| Self-Timer |
2/10-Second Delay |
2/10-Second Delay |
| Mirror Lock-Up |
Yes |
Yes |
4. Best Canon Video DSLR 2020 ?
Undoubtedly Canon 1DX Mark III is the best Canon DSLR camera of 2020. The Canon 1DX Mark III camera does full sensor readout and uncroopped 4K Video recording with DPAF support upto 24 and 30 FPS. The camera is also able to record 5.4K Video, which is really a amazing thing for a DSLR camera. But, unfortunately we do have some limitations like now DPAF in RAW video mode as well as no DPAF in 4K Video mode at 60p/50p. See the list of DPAF limitations here
| Recording Modes |
DCI 4K (4096 x 2160) at 50p/59.94p [800 Mb/s]
DCI 4K (4096 x 2160) [500 Mb/s]
Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 100p/119.88p [360 Mb/s]
Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 50p/59.94p [180 Mb/s]
Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 23.976p/24.00p/25p/29.97p [90 Mb/s]
Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 50p/59.94p [60 Mb/s]
Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 23.976p/24.00p/25p/29.97p [30 Mb/s]
Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 50p/59.94p [60 Mb/s]
Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 23.976p/24.00p/25p/29.97p [30 Mb/s]
Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 25p/29.97p [12 Mb/s] |
5.4K RAW (59.94p / 50.00p) 2,600 Mbps
5.4K RAW (29.97p / 25.00p / 24.00p / 23.98p)
4K DCI (59.94p / 50.00p) / ALL-I
4K DCI (59.94p / 50.00p) / IPB
4K DCI (29.97p / 25.00p / 24.00p / 23.98p) / ALL-I
4K DCI Crop (29.97p / 25.00p / 24.00p / 23.98p) / IPB Approx. 120 Mbps
4K UHD (59.94p / 50.00p) / ALL-I
4K UHD (59.94p / 50.00p) / IPB
4K UHD (29.97p / 25.00p) / ALL-I
Full HD (119.9p / 100.0p) / ALL-I
Full HD (59.94p / 50.00p) / ALL-I
Full HD (59.94p / 50.00p) / IPB
Full HD (29.97p / 25.00p) / ALL-I
|
| External Recording Modes |
Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 100p/120p
Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 50p/59.94p
Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 23.976p/24.00p/25p/29.97p
Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 25p/29.97p |
|
| Recording Limit |
Up to 29 Minutes, 59 Seconds for DCI 4K (4096 x 2160) |
Up to 29 Minutes, 59 Seconds |
| Video Encoding |
NTSC/PAL |
|
| ISO Sensitivity |
Auto/Manual: 100 to 25600 |
Auto/Manual: 100 to 25600 |
| Audio Recording |
Built-In Microphone (Mono)
External Microphone Input |
Built-In Microphone (Mono)
External Microphone Input |
| Audio File Format |
AAC, Linear PCM (Stereo) |
AAC, Linear PCM (Stereo) |
5. Fastest Canon Camera in 2020 ?
We have to accept the fact Canon done lot of improvement in Canon 1DX Mark III camera compared to its predecessor. Canon New 1DX Mark III camera features
- Brand New Phase AF Sensor (191 AF point)
- New Eye AF Tracking Modes in Still and Video (III / 3rd gen DPAF Tech finally in flagship )
- Continuous AF upto 16FPS (MAX 20 FPS)
- AF Sensitivity range improved (Upto 1 Stop)
- 525 AF Zones added to redesigned 20MP Sensor (More dense AF)
6. AF System Comparison – Canon 1DX Mark III vs Canon 1DX Mark II
| Focus Type |
Auto and Manual Focus |
Auto and Manual Focus |
|
| Focus Mode |
Continuous-Servo AF (C), Manual Focus (M), Single-Servo AF (S) |
Continuous-Servo AF (C), Manual Focus (M), Single-Servo AF (S) |
|
| Autofocus Points |
Phase Detection: 61 (41 Cross-Type) |
Up to 191 points (cross type AF point: up to 155 points) |
|
| Autofocus Sensitivity |
-3 to +18 EV |
-4 to +21 EV |
|
7. Viewfinder / Display Unit – Canon 1DX Mark III vs Canon 1DX Mark II
Canon used more dense display this time, and not only that we also have illuminated buttons.
| Viewfinder Type |
Optical (Pentaprism) |
Optical (Pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder Eye Point |
20 mm |
20 mm |
| Viewfinder Coverage |
100% |
100% |
| Viewfinder Magnification |
Approx. 0.76x |
Approx. 0.76x |
| Diopter Adjustment |
-3 to +1 |
-3 to +1 |
| Monitor Size |
3.2″ |
3.2″ |
| Monitor Resolution |
1,620,000 Dot |
2,100,000 Dot |
| Monitor Type |
Fixed Touchscreen LCD |
Fixed Touchscreen LCD |
8. Flash Memory – Canon 1DX Mark III vs Canon 1DX Mark II
Introduction of DUAL CFexpress memory card lot is a welcome edition.
| Memory Card Slot |
Slot 1: CompactFlash (UDMA 7)
Slot 2: CFast (CFast 2.0) |
Dual Slot: CFexpress |
| Wireless |
Wi-Fi (via Adapter) |
Wi-Fi (via Adapter) |
| GPS |
No |
No |
9. Physical Comparison
The new camera have exactly same body size compared to its predecessor. But, weigh 300gm less than Canon 1DX Mark II.
| Battery |
1 x LP-E19 Rechargeable Lithium-Ion, 11.1 VDC, 2750 mAh (Approx. 1210 Shots)
or
1 x LP-E4N Rechargeable Lithium-Ion, 11.1 VDC, 2450 mAh
or
1 x LP-E4 Rechargeable Lithium-Ion, 11.1 VDC, 2300 mAh |
1 x LP-E19 Rechargeable Lithium-Ion, 11.1 VDC, 2750 mAh (Approx. 1210 Shots)
or
1 x LP-E4N Rechargeable Lithium-Ion, 11.1 VDC, 2450 mAh
or
1 x LP-E4 Rechargeable Lithium-Ion, 11.1 VDC, 2300 mAh |
| Dimensions (W x H x D) |
158 x 167.6 x 82.6 mm |
158.0 x 167.6 x 82.6 mm |
| Weight |
1530 g (Body with Battery and Memory) |
1,250 g (Body with Battery and Memory) |
10. Canon 1DX Mark III vs Canon 1DX Mark II Verdict
Canon does updated the camera, but in a limited way. If you are a sports shooter and if you think the new AF system will help you than you can sure invest $6000+ in the camera body. If you are someone who already own Canon 1DX Mark II camera and thinking for and upgrade, I will recommend you should wait, Canon EOS R professional on its way and it will sure surprise us with its core specification.
Get Canon 1DX Mark III camera from Amazon.com | B&H Store
Get LIVE RUMORS –> FACEBOOK | TWITTER | INSTAGRAM to to get live news + Canon rumors 24X7
|
KEEP THIS BLOG ALIVE - Support New Camera Buy Canon Lenses, Buy Music CD or Digital Camera at amazon it helps this site, and you do not pay anything extra, it is just a way to help support this site.
|
