Comparison Review « NEW CAMERA

Nikon Z50 II vs Sony ZV-E10 II

By admin, on November 18th, 2024

Let’s Compare the Sony ZV-E10 II and the Nikon Z50 II. The big question is, which one is better for your own personal requirements and your budget too? So, we are going to compare the major differences between the two, and you have to keep your requirements in mind. Every time we compare the major specs of the cameras, here we are also analyzing that particular spec in our conclusion and verdict part. Jump in and find out the best camera for you!

Nikon Z50 II vs Canon R10 | Nikon Z50 II vs Sony A6700

Design and Build

Feature	Nikon Z50 II	Sony ZV-E10 II
Lens Mount	Nikon Z	Sony E
Body Material	Magnesium Alloy	Polycarbonate with Metal Components
Weight (With Battery)	Approx. 450 g	377 g
Dimensions (W x H x D)	126.5 x 93.5 x 60 mm	114.8 x 67.5 x 54.2 mm
Monitor Display	3.2″ 1.04M-Dot Tilting Touchscreen LCD	3.0″ 1.03M-Dot Articulating Touchscreen LCD
Viewfinder	0.39″ OLED, 2.36M-Dot, 100% coverage	No Viewfinder
Weather-Sealing	Yes	No
Built-In ND Filter	No	No
Hot Shoe Mount	Yes	Yes (Multi-Interface Shoe for Accessories)

Design – Compact Creator vs Rugged Explore

These two cameras are completely different specifically design-wise. The Sony ZV-E10 Mark II camera does have a small hand grip for shooting occasionally, but as we know since it belongs to the SONY ZV Series has been designed for content creation and cinematography. It has an ultra-compact body with fewer controls. The camera also doesn’t have any weather sealing over it neither the EVF.

The Nikon Z50 Mark II HYBRID camera has an electronic viewfinder with 1000 nits brightness. It also has a very deep and redesigned hand grip, even better than its predecessor. At the same time, the body is weather-sealed, so you can shoot in uncontrolled light environments without any issues.

Best Camera as per Design Conclusion / Verdict

For portability, flexibility, and easier controls, the Sony ZV-E10 II leads. Again, for durability, extensive manual controls, and outdoor adventure, it is recommended to use the Nikon Z50 II camera.

Imaging Capabilities

Feature	Nikon Z50 II	Sony ZV-E10 II
Sensor Type and Size	APS-C CMOS, 23.5 x 15.7 mm	APS-C CMOS, 23.3 x 15.5 mm
Resolution	20.9 MP	26 MP
ISO Sensitivity (Photo)	100-51,200 (Expandable to 204,800)	100-32,000 (Expandable to 50-102,400)
Continuous Shooting Speed	11 fps 200 RAW/ 15 fps / 30 Fps Jpeg	Up to 11 fps for 59 RAW / 1000 JPEG Frames
Autofocus Points (Photo)	209 Phase-Detection Points	759 Phase-Detection Points
Low-Light AF Sensitivity	-9 EV	-3 EV
Image Stabilization	VR for Video only	Digital + GYRO (Video Only)
Aspect Ratios Available	3:2, 16:9	3:2, 16:9
Image File Formats	JPEG, NEF (RAW)	JPEG, HEIF, Raw

High Resolution vs Low Light Sensitivity

As we know, the Sony ZV-E10 II camera features a 26-megapixel CMOS sensor, while the Nikon Z50 II has a 20.9-megapixel sensor. Due to the resolution difference, the Sony ZV-E10 II camera captures more detail at the base ISO range starting from ISO 100-400, and it’s more recommended for landscape photography, portraits, and product shots where one wants to harness the maximum amount of detail possible from a camera.

On the other hand, we have the Nikon Z50 II camera with a 20.9-megapixel sensor. Due to the lower resolution, we have large photodiodes inside this camera, which enables more incoming light to be absorbed, resulting in cleaner images at higher ISOs. For example, if you are shooting at ISO 1600 or 3200, the Z50 II camera will provide you with cleaner images compared to he compatitor.

Sensor Image Quality – Conclusion / Verdict

When shooting in uncontrolled light environments, it is highly recommended that you get the Nikon Z50 II camera, specifically when you are shooting wildlife where your subject can be at any place or time, then it’s recommended to have cameras like Z50 II that can capture better details or images at higher ISO ranges.

Autofocus: AI Precision vs Autofocus Consistency

Sony ZV-E10 II camera features 759 phase-detection autofocus points. Not only does the number of autofocus points matter, but the autofocus algorithm of the Sony ZV-E10 II camera is powered by an advanced AI AF algorithm, so it enhances the overall autofocus experience 2x better than what it was in the Sony A6400 camera.

And Nikon Z50 Mark II also arrives with an upgraded autofocus system. As per Nikon’s press text, the Z50 Mark II camera uses the same autofocus algorithm that we have seen in the Nikon Z8 camera. Having said that, it’s a major improvement in Nikon APS-C lineup, and without a doubt, you can feel it. For example, even at 30 frames per second when you are using Nikon Z50 II at C30 mode, the camera does autofocus and auto-exposure calculation in every frame. That is a clear indication of how fast the Z50 Mark II autofocus calculation has now become.

The good thing about Nikon Z50 Mark II is, apart from improved autofocus modes, the camera does autofocus sensitivity up to -9 EV, whereas in Sony it’s limited to -3 to -4 EV depending upon the type of lenses you are using in both the cameras.

30 FPS Continuous shooting speed, the Nikon Z50 II camera features continuous shooting upto 30 FPS as well as Pre-Brust modes of 0.35ses, .05 Ses, and 1.0 Sec that captures a MAX of 30 Jpegs before you hit the shutter, one of the only cameras that offer pre-burst mode in this price segment.

Best AutoFocus – Conclusion / Verdict

Now, even though the Z50 II autofocus is much improved, for action-packed VIDEOS, it is highly recommended to use the Sony ZV-E10 Mark II camera 😉 . But for shooting action-packed images at higher frame rates, Z50 is the best option where you have multiple options like shooting with a mechanical shutter or electronic, at the very same time, the camera does autofocus and auto-exposure calculation all the way, even at 30 fps. That’s the Nikon Z50 II recommended for shooting action-packed images when we have these two options in front.

Electronic Stabilization vs Gyro

None of the cameras has Sensor-Shift IS [No Mechnical], The Sony ZV-E10 II camera uses GYRO which also includes active image stabilization. The Active IS works flawlessly but needs wide lenses to crop and apply the steb. If you have that much wider better to use GYRO. Nikon Z50 Mark II camera uses electronic stabilization in video mode [E-VR], which is of course not as good as we have in the Sony ZV-E10 II, but yeah, it is effective to some extent.

Best Camera for Handheld Shooting – Conclusion / Verdict

Since none of them have any kind of mechanical stabilization inside them, and if you talk about electronic image stabilization, then Sony excels while using the active mode as well as an option to use gyro-based image stabilization.

Video Capabilities

Feature	Nikon Z50 II	Sony ZV-E10 II
Internal Recording Modes	H.264/H.265 8/10-Bit	XAVC HS/S 4:2:2 10-Bit, XAVC S 8-Bit, XAVC S-I 10-Bit
Max 4K Res.	UHD 4K 60p 1.5X Crop	UHD 4K 60p 1.04X Crop
High-Speed Recording	1920 x 1080 up to 120 fps	1080p up to 240 fps
Recording Limit	Approx. 121 mins	No recording limit
Gamma Profiles	N Log	S-Cinetone, S-Log3
Luts	RED-Luts	Picture Profiles
Built-In Microphone	Mono	Stereo
Audio Inputs and Outputs	Microphone and Headphone	Microphone input, Headphone output
Focus Points (Video)	209 Phase-Detection Points	495 Phase-Detection Points

Color Science: Grading Playground vs. Ready-to-Use Output

Sony ZV-E10 II camera is built for cinematic video and content creation purposes. It supports 4K video recording up to 60 frames per second with a negligible crop of 1.03x. At the same time, you can record your videos in 10-bit 4:2:2 internally. It also supports professional-grade S-Log3 and S-Cinetone, which professionals generally prefer to use.

The Sony ZV-E10 II camera also features a gyro-based image stabilization system backed by Active Mode, so depending on the type of lens you have, you can utilize any of these image stabilization methods.

Yes, we do have Product Showcase Mode and Active Framing, ideal for content creators shooting solo content. Additionally, the battery life and ultra-compact body make it highly portable.

Nikon Z50 II camera features 4K 60p recording with a 1.5x crop, which may or may not suit many professionals out there. However, the good news is that the Nikon Z50 II features natural color science, inspired by RED camera makers. The RED-like color science is now available in the Z50 II camera. Additionally, the camera also supports waveform function, which professionals will love.

If you make talking-head videos while sitting in your room, you can use the newly developed Product Review Mode or Product Showcase Mode of the Nikon camera. However, the image stabilization is not as effective as that of Sony’s.

If you’re a professional cinematographer, short filmmaker, or story trailer, you’ll appreciate the RED-like color science present in the Z50 II. Despite the crop in 4K 60p, if you’re okay with it, you’ll benefit from waveform support, which is highly essential for professional storytelling.

The Sony ZV-E10 II camera, designed for video creation, includes all the bells and whistles you’d wish for in a professional video camera.

Power and Connectivity

Feature	Nikon Z50 II	Sony ZV-E10 II
Battery Type	EN-EL25a, Approx. 320 Shots	NP-FZ100, Approx. 610 Shots
USB-C for Power/Charging	Yes	Yes
Media/Memory Card Slot	Single SD Slot (UHS-II)	Single SD Slot (UHS-II)
Wireless	Wi-Fi, Bluetooth	Wi-Fi (2.4/5 GHz), Bluetooth 4.2
Mobile App Compatibility	SnapBridge	Creators’ App (Android & iOS)

Nikon Z50 Mark II: Weather-Sealed BODY and Low-Light Sensor

In conclusion, the Sony ZV-E10 II camera and the Nikon Z50 Mark 2 camera are made for different types of users. If you look carefully, without a doubt, the Nikon Z50 Mark 2 camera has been made with a deep hand grip, EVF and a rugged body. The camera also features excellent low-light performance with its 20.9 MP sensor and, without the option of an optical low-pass filter, it captures decent images at base ISO. This makes it an ideal camera for wildlife photography, event photography, and even travel photography where you have a completely uncontrolled set of environments and lights.

Sony ZV-E10 II: Best for HANDHELD Content Creators

The Sony ZV-E10 II camera is a content creator’s powerhouse that offers 4K 60 FPS recording, which is almost uncropped since it has only a 1.03x crop, which is unnoticeable. You can record 10-bit videos internally, powered by S-Log3 and S-Cinetone. One of the best things about the Sony camera is that you are getting active image stabilization backed by gyro-based stabilization, ideal for those who love to shoot their content on the go. It will provide completely stable, high-quality footage. Additional features include product showcase mode, active framing, and a three-capsule microphone to record high-quality audio directly in the camera. More or less, it is highly recommended for content creators.

Sony ZV-E10 II: For Photography?

Yes, you can occasionally use the ZV-E10 II camera for photography purposes to get a resolution advantage, but it is highly recommended that you use this camera with proper lighting conditions to extract the maximum amount of detail possible.

Nikon Z50 Mark II: Cinematographers and StoryTellers

The Nikon Z50 Mark II camera does have some exceptional advantages in video recording modes that should not be overlooked. It captures clean and noise-free videos at higher ISO levels and has been inspired by RED cinema profiles. Moreover, it also features waveform capability with a weather-sealed body. So if you are a short film storyteller or beginner cinematographer, you should consider these factors before getting your first camera for professional cinematography purposes.

Sony ZV-E10 II from B&H Store | Amazon.com

Sony ZV-E10 II Recommended for:

Casual Clicks
Wedding Video
Vlogging / YouTube Content Creation
Solo Content Creation (Active Framing & Product Showcase Mode)
Cinematic SOLO Videography (with S-Log3 & S-Cinetone)
Casual Travel Videography
Compact, On-the-Go Shooting

Get a Nikon Z50 Mark II camera from the B&H Store | Amazon.com

Nikon Z50 II Recommended for:

Low-Light Photography
Wildlife Photography
Wedding Photography
Event Photography (due to clean high ISO performance)
Documentary Videography
Cinematic Filmmaking (low light, RED-inspired color science)
Rugged Outdoor Photography (weather-sealed body)
Travel Photography in Challenging Environments
High ISO Videography
Professional Video Shoots (Waveform & RED LUTs)

Support us – Use or affiliate link Amazon.com | B&H Store for the next purchase u make – it helps us 🙂

Nikon Z50 II vs Canon R10

By admin, on November 9th, 2024

Let us compare the Nikon Z50 II with the Canon R10 camera. Let’s explore the main differences between these two cameras and find out which one is the best for photographers and which one is best for shooting videos. In the comparison table below, we have highlighted the differences in design, and we have created two separate tables dedicated to photography and videography features. So let’s find out the best camera between these two for your specific needs and budget.

1. Design Comparison

Feature	Nikon Z50 II	Canon R10
Body Dimensions	5 x 3.8 x 2.6″ / 127 x 96.8 x 66.5 mm	4.8 x 3.5 x 3.3″ / 122.5 x 87.8 x 83.4 mm
Weight	495 g (Body Only)	382.2 g (Body Only)
Lens Mount	Nikon Z	Canon RF
Display	3.2″ Tilting Touchscreen LCD, 1,040,000 Dot	3.0″ Free-Angle Tilting Touchscreen LCD, 1,040,000 Dot
EVF Type	Built-In Electronic (OLED), 0.39″, 2,360,000 Dot – 1000 NITS Brightness	Built-In Electronic (OLED), 2,360,000 Dot
Battery Type	EN-EL25a or EN-EL25, approx. 230 shots	LP-E17, approx. 430 shots
Ports	USB-C Data & Power, Micro-HDMI, Mic & Headphone Jacks	USB-C, Micro-HDMI, Mic Jack
Available Lenses	Nikon Z DX and FX lenses	Canon RF-S and RF lenses

2. Photographic Feature Comparison

Feature	Nikon Z50 II	Canon R10
Sensor Type	BSI CMOS	FSI CMOS
Sensor Size	23.5 x 15.7 mm (APS-C)	22.3 x 14.9 mm (APS-C)
Effective Resolution	20.9 Megapixel	24.2 Megapixel
ISO Range (Photo)	100 to 51,200 (Extended: 100 to 204,800)	100 to 32,000 (Extended: 100 to 51,200)
Shutter Type	Mechanical Focal Plane, Electronic Rolling	Mechanical, Electronic Rolling
Shutter Speed (Mechanical)	1/4000 to 900 sec	1/4000 to 30 sec
Bulb Mode	Yes	Yes
Continuous Shooting (Mech)	Up to 11 fps at 20.9 MP	Up to 15 fps at 24.2 MP
Continuous Shooting (Elec)	Up to 30 fps at 20.9 MP (JPEG)	Up to 23 fps at 24.2 MP
Pre-Capture Mode	1 Sec	0.5 Sec
Autofocus Points	231 (Phase & Contrast Detection)	651 (Phase Detection Zones)
AF Sensitivity	-9 to +19 EV	-4 to +20 EV
AF Modes	Continuous-Servo AF, Full-Time AF, Manual, Single-Servo AF	Continuous-Servo AF, Manual, Single-Servo AF
Weather sealed	Yes	No
Battery Life	250 Shots	450 Shots

3. Video Comparison

Feature	Nikon Z50 II	Canon R10
Sensor Type	BSI CMOS	FSI CMOS
Video Resolution & Frame Rates	UHD 4K (30 fps) Uncropped	UHD 4K (30 fps) Uncropped
4k 60 FPS	1.5X Cropped	1.5x Cropped
Full HD Max Frame rate	120 FPS	100 FPS
Product showcase mode	Yes	No
Video Stabilization	Digital (Video Only)	Digital (Video Only)
Internal Recording Codec	H.264/H.265 (8/10-Bit)	H.264 MP4 4:2:0 8-Bit, H.265 MP4 4:2:2 10-Bit
External Recording Codec	HDMI 4K	HDMI 1080p
HDR/LOG Support	HDR-HLG, Nikon N-Log	HDR-PQ
Support RAW Video	Yes, N-Log available	No, C-Log isn’t there
Recording Limit	Up to 125 minutes	Upto 120 Mins
Audio Recording	Stereo, 24-Bit 48 kHz LPCM or 16-Bit AAC	Stereo, 2-Channel AAC

Conclusion Verdict

The Nikon Z50 II camera now has much-improved autofocus and also a low-light sensor, which helps to extract the maximum amount of detail possible in uncontrolled lighting environments or in any outdoor location. For wedding and event photography, we recommend you to go with Nikon Z50 II

Now, for sports and wildlife, it depends on which camera you like to buy since both are very capable. But again, due to the presence of a BSI CMOS sensor, the Z50 Mark II camera will perform better in uncontrolled lighting environments, specifically when you are using this camera for wildlife or bird photography. However, for sports events, you can take the Canon R10 with you when there is no big issue with light, as sports events generally happen during daylight. So, you may utilize the R10, and also, in sports events, you may require more reliable autofocus tracking, which is present in the Canon R10 alongside its slightly faster 15 fps mechanical shutter.

For day-to-day usage and street photography, I am going to recommend the Nikon Z50 Mark II camera. Due to the nature of its sensor and construction, the camera is able to capture clear shots and also has high low-light autofocus sensitivity compared to the R10. So more or less, for uncontrolled lighting environments of any type, the Nikon Z50 Mark II is more recommended. 165

Get a Nikon Z50 Mark II camera from the B&H Store | Amazon.com

Canon R10 – Camera body $879 [B&H Store] [Amazon.com] |

Type of Photography/Video	Recommended Camera
Wedding and Event Photography	Nikon Z50 II Due to its improved autofocus, low-light sensor, and availability of third-large amount party lenses , we recommend you to go with Nikon Z50 II
Wildlife and Bird Photography	Nikon Z50 II The BSI CMOS sensor in the Z50 II performs well in low-light and uncontrolled lighting, which is often required in wildlife photography. + You get AF sensitivity down to – 9 FV and upscaled 3d AI AF tracking.
Sports Photography (Daylight Events)	Canon R10 Reliable autofocus tracking and slightly faster 15 fps mechanical shutter make the R10 a strong choice for sports events in daylight conditions.
Everyday Use and Street Photography	Nikon Z50 II Excellent low-light autofocus sensitivity and sensor design allow the Z50 II to capture clear shots in diverse lighting, making it versatile for daily use.
General Video Needs	Canon R10 (for daylight, faster autofocus) OR Nikon Z50 II (for low-light video)

Nikon Z50 II Image Quality Test

Nikon Z30 / Zfc Image samples have been taken here since Nikon Z50 II and Zfc, both of them share the same sensor, so image quality is expected to remain exactly same as of the Nikon Z50 Mark II. Image credit dpreview.com

In the Image below we have compared the Nikon Z30 vs Canon R10 Images at ISO 25600, in RAW mode, as you can see the details are much preserved in Nikon Z50 II file

Next comparison Even in the JPEG comparison below you can see that Nikon is preserving more details compared to the Canon R10 FSI CMOS sensor.

During the base ISO test we can see the letters in the Nikon Z50 II are more clearly visible than those of the Canon R10, despite having higher resolution Canon isn’t able to extract the amount of details they should at the base ISO range

In the JPEG Mode, the performance of the Canon R10 Camera is much improved which may be due to JPEG filters the Nikon Z30 sample at base ISO losing a bit of details which was visible in the RAW Mode.

Verdict / Conclusion Image Quality

In terms of image quality, the Nikon Z50 II performs better than the Canon R10 at higher ISO settings, particularly when shooting in RAW mode. The Nikon Z50 II (or Z30) tends to capture more details at higher ISOs due to its 20MP sensor and lack of a low-pass filter, which helps to maintain fine textures.

However, at base ISO, when shooting in JPEG, the Canon R10 may show slightly more detail due to its higher 24MP resolution. But if you’re shooting in RAW at base ISO, the Nikon cameras can still provide a slightly clearer picture due to the low-pass-less design, which can enhance sharpness. Overall, for detail preservation, the Nikon Z50 II’s 20MP sensor has a slight edge, especially for those who prioritize high ISO performance and RAW shooting.

Support us – Use or affiliate link Amazon.com | B&H Store for the next purchase u make – it helps us

Fuji X-M5 vs Sony A6700 – 15 Major Differences for Photographers and Videographers

By admin, on October 15th, 2024

Let’s compare the Fuji X-M5 versus the Sony A6700 camera. We have compared the photographic & videography features in a separate table, so you can easily understand which camera is best for you.

If you are a photographer, which camera should you buy? Again, if you are a content creator, videographer, or wedding filmmaker, which camera should you choose?

Take a look at the specification comparison table below, where we have highlighted the major differences between the two cameras. They also have some similarities, but the good thing is that the Fuji X-M5 camera is able not only to compete but also to uplift the competition bar by upscaling the core specifications.

Fuji X-M5 vs Sony A6700 – 15 Major Differences for Photographers

Feature	Fuji X-M5	Sony A6700
Sensor Resolution	26.1 MP APS-C CMOS	26 MP APS-C Exmor R BSI CMOS
Image Processor	X-Processor 5	BIONZ XR
ISO Range (Photography)	160 to 12,800 (Extended: 80 to 51,200)	100 to 32,000 (Extended: 50 to 102,400)
Autofocus Points (Photo)	425 Phase Detection Points	759 Phase Detection Points
Autofocus Sensitivity	-7 EV	-3 EV
Continuous Shooting	Up to 30 fps (Electronic, cropped)	Up to 11 fps (Mechanical & Electronic)
Viewfinder	No Viewfinder	2.36M-dot OLED Viewfinder
Shutter Speed (Mechanical)	1/4000 to 30 seconds	1/8000 to 30 seconds
Mechanical Shutter	Yes	Yes
Image Stabilization	NA	5-Axis In-Body Image Stabilization (IBIS)
Sensor Type	Standard CMOS	Backside Illuminated (BSI) CMOS
Weather Sealing	Yes (Dust & Water Resistant)	Yes (Dust & Moisture Resistant)
Battery Life (Stills)	Approx. 460 shots	Approx. 570 shots
Weight	355g (Body Only)	493g (Body Only)
Memory Card Slot	Single SD UHS-I Slot	Single SD UHS-II Slot + CFexpress Type A

Quick Analysis of Specification Differences between the two

The core specifications of the Fuji X-M5 camera look very impressive when compared with the Sony A6700 camera.

If you are a photographer, then of course you will miss the sensor-shift image stabilization in the Fuji X-M5, which is present in the Sony A6700.

Having image stabilization in your camera is really important if you shoot images in low-light environments. The image sensor compensates for hand movements even when you are using a slow shutter speed, resulting in neat and clean images.

Another feature that will help the Sony A6700 camera is the high ISO range, which is expandable from 50 up to 102400.

But wait, we still have some significant differences that might affect your choice. Another big difference for photographers to consider is the continuous shooting speed. If you don’t want any rolling shutter effect visible in your images, you have to use the mechanical shutter, as the electronic shutter can cause rolling shutter effects, especially with non-stacked sensors.

Autofocus Sensitivity and Tracking

Finally, let’s talk about the autofocusing systems of both cameras. We have seen the autofocus sensitivity difference between the two. If you compare them, the Fuji X-M5 camera looks very impressive with -7 EV autofocus sensitivity against the A6700 camera, which has -3 EV autofocus sensitivity. But this autofocus sensitivity only works once to acquire the autofocus point in extremely low-light situations.

Now, let’s consider a situation where quick moment-to-moment focus is needed. In this case, the Fuji X-M5 may focus more quickly compared to the A6700, due to its AF sensitivity. However, when we talk about autofocus tracking performance, due to the higher number of phase-detect autofocus points present in the Sony sensor—approximately 759 compared to Fuji’s 425—the tracking performance of the Sony A6700 sensor will be better than the X-M5.

So, we have two differences here. First, autofocus acquisition is better in the Fuji, but at the same time, the autofocus tracking performance is better in the Sony. Generally, most autofocus modes rely on the tracking performance of the camera, not on the acquisition part, so I would give a slight advantage to Sony in terms of tracking performance.

Design and Battery Life

Finally, let’s talk about the design part of both cameras. The Sony A6700 camera hand grip is deeper and much better compared to the Fuji X-M5. At the same time, we have a dedicated OLED viewfinder in the body of the Sony A6700 camera, which helps photographers who are used to using optical viewfinders from DSLRs. So, more or less, if we talk about ease of use and digital body design, the A6700 camera is more user-friendly.

At the same time, if we talk about battery backup, the Sony offers a bigger battery, resulting in more shots per charge—approximately 570+, whereas in Fuji, you are getting around 460. So yes, we do have some differences.

Conclusion: The best camera for photographer

should you go with the Fuji X-M5 or the Sony A6700? We get some extra features from inside to out with the Sony A6700 camera. Have a look:

The positive features of the Sony A6700 include the presence of a sensor-shift image stabilization system, which helps capture clear images in low-light environments. At the same time, the wide ISO range, starting from 50, is completely absent in the Fuji X-M5. Additionally, the A6700 offers a bigger battery life, which makes it a better option for professional photographers.

Not only that, but we also have a very large range of E-mount lenses from Sigma, Tamron, and many other brands. Although the Fuji X-mount is also open, it is not as big or broad as the E-mount at the moment, even though there are many options in X-mount.

Compared to the X-M5, we do see some advantages like autofocus sensitivity and continuous shooting speed. So, if you really want a camera with fast continuous shooting speed and don’t care much about the ISO range, image stabilization system, battery grip, or battery life, then the X-M5 might be a good option. However, for a photographer, we highly recommend the Sony A6700.

Fuji X-M5 vs Sony A6700 – 15 Major Video-Related Differences

Feature	Fuji X-M5	Sony A6700
MAX Video Resolution	6.2K up to 30 fps	4K up to 120 fps
Slow-Motion Video	1080p at 240 fps	4K at 120 fps, FHD at 240 fps
Video Codec	H.264/H.265 (HEVC)	H.264/H.265 (HEVC), XAVC S-I
Video Bitrate	400 Mb/s	600 Mb/s
Video Recording Limit	50 minutes in 4K	No Recording Limit
Log Profiles	F-Log, F-Log 2	S-Log 3, S-Cinetone
Autofocus Points (Video)	425 Phase Detection Points	759 Phase Detection Points
Autofocus Features	Face/Eye Detection	Real-time Tracking, Eye AF for Video, AI framing
External Recording	4:2:2 10-bit via HDMI	4:2:2 10-bit via HDMI
Viewfinder for Video	No EVF	Yes, 2.36M-dot OLED Viewfinder
Display Type	3-Way Tilting LCD	Fully Articulating LCD
Video Stabilization	Electronic	5-Axis IBIS + Active Mode for Video + Gyro
Audio Inputs	3.5mm Mic Jack, 3.5mm Headphone Jack	3.5mm Mic Jack, 3.5mm Headphone Jack
Mobile Streaming	No	Yes (IP Streaming 4K)

video core specifications

Let’s compare the video core specifications between the Fuji X-M5 and the Sony A6700 cameras.

We have an open gate option in the Fuji X-M5, which videographers will love, especially for professional filmmaking, allowing them to decide the format and ratio for an entire scene. It’s better to record in open gate. In addition, we have options like Full HD mode at 240 frames per second for capturing slow-motion videos.

However, if you compare the X-M5’s features against the Sony A6700, you will miss the higher-resolution open gate mode. But aside from that, the Sony A6700 offers 4K @ 120 frames per second and can also record Full HD videos at 240 frames per second. The bitrate is approximately 600 Mbps, which is better than the X-M5’s 400 Mbps, even though Fuji offers a 6.2K open gate recording option.

A higher bitrate means more color information, and this will definitely help Sony users a bit more. In addition, we have a dedicated AI chip in the Sony A6700, which enhances autofocus tracking performance in video mode, including AI-based auto framing.

The good news is that Fuji is also improving their autofocus modes in the new X-M5 camera. Similar to Sony, they have introduced a product feature mode in the X-M5, showing Fuji is slowly trying to compete with Sony’s features in the A6700 camera.

Aside from all these features, the Sony A6700 has a 2.36-million-dot electronic viewfinder, which may not directly help with filmmaking, but is still a useful feature. However, the biggest factor is the presence of a sensor-shift image stabilization system.

With sensor-shift image stabilization, we can use active mode in video on the Sony camera to achieve smooth and stable footage. Sony also offers a gyro-based image stabilization system, which can smooth out footage like a GoPro when processed with special software.

Conclusion – Best Camera for Video

When you compare all these features, the Sony A6700 looks more appealing. However, if you are a Filmmakers (Independent or Short Films) prefer the open-gate recording format, you can go with the Fuji X-M5. But if you’re asking which one is more usable and practical camera, for

For Wedding Cinematographers
For Traditional Videographers (Corporate, Documentaries):
For Content Creators

The Sony A6700 is more usable, with its 4K 120 FPS mode, advanced autofocus tracking with a dedicated AI chip, and hybrid image stabilization, which is the better option. The Sony A6700 simply offers a more advanced set of features.

Final Recommendations:

Fuji X-M5 is recommended for filmmakers who need open gate recording and prefer high-resolution control.
Sony A6700 is a all-in-one all-rounder for content creators, wedding cinematographers, and traditional videographers, features advanced autofocus, 4K 120 FPS, and Excellent stabilization features.

Fuji X-M5 Price

Fujifilm X-M5 Body: £799 / €899- B&H Store

Fujifilm X-M5 + XC 15-45 Kit: £899 / €999 – B&H Store

Sony A6700 Price

Sony A6700 Body: $1398 B&H Store | Amazon.com

Sony A6700 with Kit Lens: $1498 – B&H Store and Amazon.com

Support us – Use or affiliate link Amazon.com | B&H Store for the next purchase u make – it helps us

Fuji X-T5 vs Fuji X-H2

By admin, on November 1st, 2022

Both of the Fuji Cameras feature the latest X-Processor 5 engine and a 5th-gen 40MP X-Trans BSI APS-C sensor, despite having the same sensor and image processor we do have some differences in the core specs of both cameras.


Camera	FUJI X-T5	FUJI X-H2
Sensor Type	Effective: 40.2 Megapixel (6240 x 4160)	Effective: 40.2 Megapixel
Crop Factor	23.5 x 15.6 mm (APS-C) CMOS	23.5 x 15.6 mm (APS-C) CMOS
Image Stabilization	1.5x	1.5x
Built-In ND Filter	Sensor-Shift, 5-Axis	Sensor-Shift, 5-Axis
Capture Type	None	None
	Stills & Video	Stills & Video

The Autofocus specification of both cameras is exactly similar to each other since we have the same sensor and image processor here. So, more or less the image quality of the camera and the AF performance of both are expected to remain the same.

	FUJI X-T5	FUJI X-H2
Focus Type	Auto and Manual Focus	Auto and Manual Focus
Focus Mode	Continuous-Servo AF, Manual Focus, Single-Servo AF	Continuous-Servo AF, Manual Focus, Single-Servo AF
Autofocus Points	Photo, Video Contrast Detection, Phase Detection: 425	Photo, Video Contrast Detection, Phase Detection: 425
Built-In Flash	No	No
Flash Modes	Auto, Commander, First-Curtain Sync, Manual, Off, Second-Curtain Sync, TTL Auto	Auto, Commander, First-Curtain Sync, Manual, Off, Second-Curtain Sync, TTL Auto
Maximum Sync Speed	250 Second	250 Second
External Flash Connection	Hot Shoe, PC Terminal	Hot Shoe, PC Terminal

As you can see we have a slightly better base ISO range in the Fuji X-H2 camera. Although the extent ISO range of both cameras remains the same.

X-H2 125 to 12,800 in Manual, Auto Mode (Extended: 80 to 51,200)
X-T5 – 160 to 12,800 in Auto Mode (Extended: 80 to 51,200)

	FUJI X-T5	FUJI X-H2
Shutter Type	Electronic Shutter, Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter	Electronic Shutter, Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter
Shutter Speed	Mechanical Shutter 1/8000 to 900 Seconds in Manual Mode 1/8000 to 900 Seconds in Shutter Priority Mode 1/8000 to 30 Seconds in Aperture Priority Mode 1/8000 to 4 Seconds in Program Mode Up to 60 Minutes in Bulb Mode Electronic Shutter 1/32000 to 900 Seconds in Manual Mode 1/32000 to 900 Seconds in Shutter Priority Mode Electronic Front Curtain Shutter 1/8000 to 900 Seconds in Manual Electronic Shutter 1/8000 to 1/4 Second in Movie Mode	Mechanical Shutter 1/8000 to 4 Seconds in Program Mode 1/8000 to 30 Seconds in Aperture Priority Mode 1/8000 to 15 Minutes in Manual Mode Up to 60 Minutes in Bulb Mode Electronic Shutter 1/8000 to 4 Seconds in Program Mode 1/8000 to 30 Seconds in Aperture Priority Mode 1/8000 to 15 Minutes in Manual Mode Fixed 1 Second in Bulb Mode
Bulb/Time Mode	Bulb Mode	Bulb Mode
ISO Sensitivity	Photo 160 to 12,800 in Auto Mode (Extended: 80 to 51,200) Video 160 to 12,800 in Auto Mode (Extended: 160 to 25,600)	Photo 125 to 12,800 in Manual, Auto Mode (Extended: 80 to 51,200) Video 125 to 12,800 in Manual, Auto Mode (Extended: 80 to 25,600)
Metering Method	Average, Center-Weighted Average, Multiple, Spot	Average, Center-Weighted Average, Multi-Zone, Spot
Exposure Modes	Aperture Priority, Manual, Program, Shutter Priority	Aperture Priority, Auto, Manual, Program, Shutter Priority
Exposure Compensation	-5 to +5 EV (1/3 EV Steps)	-5 to +5 EV (1/3 EV Steps)
Continuous Shooting	Mechanical Shutter Mechanical Shutter Approx. 15fps (JPEG: 119frames,Compressed RAW:39 frames, Lossless Compressed RAW 22 frames, Uncompressed RAW: 19frames, Compressed RAW + JPEG 27 frames) Mechanical Shutter Approx. 10fps (JPEG: 1000+ frames,Compressed RAW: 56 frames, Lossless Compressed RAW 29 frames, Uncompressed RAW: 19 frames, Compressed RAW + JPEG: 34 frames) Electronic Shutter Electronic Shutter Approx. 20fps (1.29x Crop) (JPEG: 16frames,Compressed RAW: 72, Lossless Compressed RAW 41, Uncompressed RAW: 37 frames, Uncompressed RAW + JPEG: 23 frames) Electronic Shutter Approx. 13fps (1.29x Crop) (JPEG: 1000+ frames,Compressed RAW: 104, Lossless Compressed RAW: 53, Uncompressed RAW: 23 frames, Compressed RAW + JPEG: 56, Lossless compressed RAW + JPEG: 44, Uncompressed RAW + JPEG: 23)	Mechanical Shutter Up to 15 fps at 26.1 MP for up to 38 Frames (Raw) / 110 Frames (JPEG) Up to 10 fps at 26.1 MP for up to 44 Frames (Raw) / 164 Frames (JPEG) Up to 8 fps at 26.1 MP for up to 49 Frames (Raw) / 200 Frames (JPEG)Electronic Shutter Up to 20 fps at 26.1 MP for up to 36 Frames (Raw) / 79 Frames (JPEG) Up to 30 fps at 20.9 MP for up to 35 Frames (Raw) / 60 Frames (JPEG) Up to 20 fps at 20.9 MP for up to 37 Frames (Raw) / 114 Frames (JPEG) Up to 10 fps at 20.9 MP for up to 48 Frames (Raw) / 500 Frames (JPEG)

The difference in BASE ISO Range

So, with such a little difference in the base ISO range, we don’t expect much difference in the performance of both cameras. Yes, under LAB TEST results we may see some difference in DR due to the minor difference we have in the base ISO range, but in real-world usage, we won’t be able to spot any difference.

Buffer Limitation

Fuji X-T5 is able to save only 119 Jpeg in single bursts whereas the Fuji X-H2 camera is able to save up to 1000+ Jpeg in a single burst. CF CFexpress Type B also missing in the new X-T5.

	FUJI X-T5	FUJI X-H2
Internal Recording Modes	H.264/H.265/MOV 10-Bit 6.2K (16:9) – 6240 x3150: 29.97p/ 25p/ 24p/ 23.98p 360Mbps/200Mbps/ 100Mbps/ 50MbpsDCI 4K (17:9) – 4096 x2160: 59.94p/ 50p/ 29.97p/ 25p/ 24p/ 23.98p 360Mbps/ 200Mbps/100Mbps/50Mbps4K (16:9) – 3840 x2160: 59.94p/ 50p/ 29.97p/ 25p/ 24p/ 23.98p 720Mbps/ 360Mbps/ 200Mbps/ 100Mbps/ 50MbpsFull HD (17:9) -2048 x1080: 59.94p/ 50p/ 29.97p/ 25p/ 24p/23.98p 360Mbps/ 200Mbps/ 100Mbps/ 50Mbps	Raw 7680 x 4320 up to 29.97 fps MOV/MP4/MPEG-4 AVC/ProRes 422/ProRes 422 HQ/ProRes 422LT UHD 8K (7680 x 4320) at 23.98/24.00/25/29.97 fps [50 to 720 Mb/s] MOV/MP4/MPEG-4/ProRes 422/ProRes 422 HQ/ProRes 422LT 6240 x 4160 at 23.98/24.00/25/29.97 fps [50 to 720 Mb/s] DCI 4K (4096 x 2160) at 23.98/24.00/25/29.97/50/59.94 fps [50 to 720 Mb/s] UHD 4K (3840 x 2160) at 23.98/24.00/25/29.97/50/59.94 fps [50 to 720 Mb/s] DCI 2K (2048 x 1080) at23.98/24.00/25/29.9 /50/59.94 fps [50 to 720 Mb/s] 1920 x 1080p at 23.98/24.00/25/29.97/50/59.94/100/119.88/200/239.76 fps [50 to 720 Mb/s]

Video Limitations of X-T5

The high resolution on the sensor allows the X-H2 to record 8K up to 30p (RAW available). You can also select 6.2K video up to 30p. In 4K, you can work up to 30p with oversampling from 8K, or up to 60p with sub-sampling. In Full HD, the frame rate goes up to 240p with the High-Speed mode. With the Fuji X-T5 camera, you can record Full HD Videos up to 240fps but the MAX Video resolution available here is 6.2K video up to 30p. Undoubtedly the X-H2 is a better video camera with more features compared to X-T5.

No External Fan Support in Fuji X-T5 Camera

If you live in a western country then it’s ok, but in Asian countries where the temp goes really high in the summer season, X-T5 is left with no option to add an external fan to the camera due to the introduction of a tilting screen.

The ports of the camera and display screen are more or less likely to be the same.

	FUJI X-T5	FUJI X-H2
Media/Memory Card Slot	Dual Slot: CFexpress Type B (SD Express)	Dual Slot: CFexpress Type B (SD Express)
Video I/O	1 x HDMI Output	1 x HDMI Output
Audio I/O	1 x 1/8″ / 3.5 mm TRS Stereo Microphone Input	1 x 1/8″ / 3.5 mm TRRS Headphone/Mic Input on Camera Body 1 x 1/8″ / 3.5 mm TRRS Headphone/Mic Output on Camera Body
Power I/O	1 x USB-C Input/Output	1 x USB-C Input/Output
Wireless	Wi-Fi, Bluetooth	2.4 / 5 GHz Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) Bluetooth
Global Positioning (GPS, GLONASS, etc.)	None	None

High-Quality Viewfinder

The Fuji X-H2 camera features a HighResolution Viewfinder of 5.76 Million dots, yes the X-H2 features class-leading core specs.

Type	Built-In Electronic (OLED)	Built-In Electronic (OLED)
Size	0.5″	0.5″
Resolution	3,6M-dot OLED electronic	5.76M-dot OLED electronic
Eye Point	23 mm	100%
Coverage	100%	Approx. 0.8x
Magnification	Approx. 0.75x	-5 to +3

yes, u will have a very minimal difference in battery life. X-H2 Features a 720-shot battery life and X-T5 features a 740-shot battery life in ECO mode.

Conclusion: Which camera should you buy Fuji X-H2 or Fuji X-T5

Core specification wise we have very little difference between them and so on the price tag. If spending $200 extra on a camera body isn’t an issue for you, than its better to buy the Fuji X-H2 camera. Since u will get a slightly better base ISO range, Better EVF, and 8K video recording capability.

Get a Fuji X-H2 Camera from B&H Store | Amazon.com

Get Fuji X-T5 Camera from B&H Store | Amazon.com

See more Comparisons – Fuji X-T4 vs Fuji X-T5

Canon 1DX Mark III vs Canon 1DX Mark II

By admin, on January 6th, 2020

Get Canon 1DX Mark III camera from Amazon.com | B&H Store

TNC Exclusive – We are the first website to published detailed specification comparison review between the two camera.
Let’s have a specification comparison between the two flagship camera. The long rumored Canon 1DX Mark III camera finally arrived just before 2020 Olympic. Canon Took more than 4 years of time to create a brand new flagship camera and not only that consumers have to spend more than $6000+ to get the new body. In general Canon flagship camera arrives with lot of modifications from inside-out. Now, in this comparison we have compared each and every core specification of the camera to find out the best one.

1. Does Canon 1DX Mark III have new sensor ?

The short answer in no. They are using the same old 20MP CMOS technology they have used in the Canon 1DX Mark II camera. The sensor is redesigned to have better AF performance. So, you will be getting almost same image quality from both the camera.

2. Does Canon 1DX Mark III Have Better Image Quality than Canon 1DX Mark II ?

Slightly better (Upto 1 stop). We are getting slightly better image quality in the new Canon 1DX Mark III camera due to the introduction new Dual-Digic 6 image processor inside the camera we are getting 1 stop more ISO range in extended mode compared to the Canon 1DX Mark II camera. Not only that Canon 1DX Mark III also features new image decoding algorithm and with the help of the that we may notice some betterment in the DR, performance of the camera.

3. Sensor Details Comparison – Canon 1DX Mark III vs Canon 1DX Mark II

Lens Mount	Canon EF	Canon EF
Camera Format	Full-Frame (1x Crop Factor)	Full-Frame (1x Crop Factor)
Pixels	Actual: 21.5 Megapixel Effective: 20.2 Megapixel	Actual: 21.5 Megapixel Effective: 20.2 Megapixel
Maximum Resolution	5472 x 3648	5472 x 3648
Aspect Ratio	3:2	3:2
Sensor Type	CMOS	CMOS
Sensor Size	36 x 24 mm	36 x 24 mm
Image File Format	JPEG, RAW	JPEG, HEIF, Raw
Bit Depth	14-Bit	14-Bit
Image Stabilization	None	None

Having a 20MP sensor isn’t a bad thing for sports shooter, but not updating it even after 5 years of gap is bad. We do know that Sony is using BSI and Stacked CMOS sensor in their flasghip A7 and A9 cameras. But, in Canon we are still sicked to plain CMOS Tech that’s really embarrassing in 2020. ISO range of the camera extended upto 1 stop in MAX range thanks to the new image processor and image decoding algorithms.

ISO Sensitivity	Auto, 100 to 51200 (Extended: 50 to 409600)	Auto, 100 to 51200 (Extended: 50 to ISO 819200)
Shutter Speed	Electronic Front Curtain Shutter 1/8000 to 30 Seconds Bulb Mode	Electronic Front Curtain Shutter 1/8000 to 30 Seconds Bulb Mode
Metering Method	Evaluative, Partial, Spot	Evaluative, Partial, Spot
Exposure Modes	Aperture Priority, Manual, Program, Shutter Priority	Aperture Priority, Manual, Program, Shutter Priority
Exposure Compensation	-5 to +5 EV (1/3, 1/2 EV Steps)	-5 to +5 EV (1/3, 1/2 EV Steps)
Metering Range	0 to 20 EV	0 to 20 EV
White Balance	Auto, Cloudy, Color Temperature, Custom, Daylight, Flash, Fluorescent (White), Shade, Tungsten	Auto, Cloudy, Color Temperature, Custom, Daylight, Flash, Fluorescent (White), Shade, Tungsten
Continuous Shooting	Up to 14 fps at 20.2 MP for up to 170 Exposures (Raw)	Up to 20 fps at 20.2 MP for up to 1000+ Exposures (Raw)
Interval Recording	No	No
Self-Timer	2/10-Second Delay	2/10-Second Delay
Mirror Lock-Up	Yes	Yes

4. Best Canon Video DSLR 2020 ?

Undoubtedly Canon 1DX Mark III is the best Canon DSLR camera of 2020. The Canon 1DX Mark III camera does full sensor readout and uncroopped 4K Video recording with DPAF support upto 24 and 30 FPS. The camera is also able to record 5.4K Video, which is really a amazing thing for a DSLR camera. But, unfortunately we do have some limitations like now DPAF in RAW video mode as well as no DPAF in 4K Video mode at 60p/50p. See the list of DPAF limitations here

Recording Modes	DCI 4K (4096 x 2160) at 50p/59.94p [800 Mb/s] DCI 4K (4096 x 2160) [500 Mb/s] Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 100p/119.88p [360 Mb/s] Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 50p/59.94p [180 Mb/s] Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 23.976p/24.00p/25p/29.97p [90 Mb/s] Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 50p/59.94p [60 Mb/s] Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 23.976p/24.00p/25p/29.97p [30 Mb/s] Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 50p/59.94p [60 Mb/s] Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 23.976p/24.00p/25p/29.97p [30 Mb/s] Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 25p/29.97p [12 Mb/s]	5.4K RAW (59.94p / 50.00p) 2,600 Mbps 5.4K RAW (29.97p / 25.00p / 24.00p / 23.98p) 4K DCI (59.94p / 50.00p) / ALL-I 4K DCI (59.94p / 50.00p) / IPB 4K DCI (29.97p / 25.00p / 24.00p / 23.98p) / ALL-I 4K DCI Crop (29.97p / 25.00p / 24.00p / 23.98p) / IPB Approx. 120 Mbps 4K UHD (59.94p / 50.00p) / ALL-I 4K UHD (59.94p / 50.00p) / IPB 4K UHD (29.97p / 25.00p) / ALL-I Full HD (119.9p / 100.0p) / ALL-I Full HD (59.94p / 50.00p) / ALL-I Full HD (59.94p / 50.00p) / IPB Full HD (29.97p / 25.00p) / ALL-I
External Recording Modes	Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 100p/120p Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 50p/59.94p Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 23.976p/24.00p/25p/29.97p Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 25p/29.97p
Recording Limit	Up to 29 Minutes, 59 Seconds for DCI 4K (4096 x 2160)	Up to 29 Minutes, 59 Seconds
Video Encoding	NTSC/PAL
ISO Sensitivity	Auto/Manual: 100 to 25600	Auto/Manual: 100 to 25600
Audio Recording	Built-In Microphone (Mono) External Microphone Input	Built-In Microphone (Mono) External Microphone Input
Audio File Format	AAC, Linear PCM (Stereo)	AAC, Linear PCM (Stereo)

5. Fastest Canon Camera in 2020 ?

We have to accept the fact Canon done lot of improvement in Canon 1DX Mark III camera compared to its predecessor. Canon New 1DX Mark III camera features

Brand New Phase AF Sensor (191 AF point)
New Eye AF Tracking Modes in Still and Video (III / 3rd gen DPAF Tech finally in flagship )
Continuous AF upto 16FPS (MAX 20 FPS)
AF Sensitivity range improved (Upto 1 Stop)
525 AF Zones added to redesigned 20MP Sensor (More dense AF)

6. AF System Comparison – Canon 1DX Mark III vs Canon 1DX Mark II

Focus Type	Auto and Manual Focus	Auto and Manual Focus
Focus Mode	Continuous-Servo AF (C), Manual Focus (M), Single-Servo AF (S)	Continuous-Servo AF (C), Manual Focus (M), Single-Servo AF (S)
Autofocus Points	Phase Detection: 61 (41 Cross-Type)	Up to 191 points (cross type AF point: up to 155 points)
Autofocus Sensitivity	-3 to +18 EV	-4 to +21 EV

7. Viewfinder / Display Unit – Canon 1DX Mark III vs Canon 1DX Mark II

Canon used more dense display this time, and not only that we also have illuminated buttons.

Viewfinder Type	Optical (Pentaprism)	Optical (Pentaprism)
Viewfinder Eye Point	20 mm	20 mm
Viewfinder Coverage	100%	100%
Viewfinder Magnification	Approx. 0.76x	Approx. 0.76x
Diopter Adjustment	-3 to +1	-3 to +1
Monitor Size	3.2″	3.2″
Monitor Resolution	1,620,000 Dot	2,100,000 Dot
Monitor Type	Fixed Touchscreen LCD	Fixed Touchscreen LCD

8. Flash Memory – Canon 1DX Mark III vs Canon 1DX Mark II

Introduction of DUAL CFexpress memory card lot is a welcome edition.

Memory Card Slot	Slot 1: CompactFlash (UDMA 7) Slot 2: CFast (CFast 2.0)	Dual Slot: CFexpress
Wireless	Wi-Fi (via Adapter)	Wi-Fi (via Adapter)
GPS	No	No

9. Physical Comparison

The new camera have exactly same body size compared to its predecessor. But, weigh 300gm less than Canon 1DX Mark II.

Battery	1 x LP-E19 Rechargeable Lithium-Ion, 11.1 VDC, 2750 mAh (Approx. 1210 Shots) or 1 x LP-E4N Rechargeable Lithium-Ion, 11.1 VDC, 2450 mAh or 1 x LP-E4 Rechargeable Lithium-Ion, 11.1 VDC, 2300 mAh	1 x LP-E19 Rechargeable Lithium-Ion, 11.1 VDC, 2750 mAh (Approx. 1210 Shots) or 1 x LP-E4N Rechargeable Lithium-Ion, 11.1 VDC, 2450 mAh or 1 x LP-E4 Rechargeable Lithium-Ion, 11.1 VDC, 2300 mAh
Dimensions (W x H x D)	158 x 167.6 x 82.6 mm	158.0 x 167.6 x 82.6 mm
Weight	1530 g (Body with Battery and Memory)	1,250 g (Body with Battery and Memory)

10. Canon 1DX Mark III vs Canon 1DX Mark II Verdict

Canon does updated the camera, but in a limited way. If you are a sports shooter and if you think the new AF system will help you than you can sure invest $6000+ in the camera body. If you are someone who already own Canon 1DX Mark II camera and thinking for and upgrade, I will recommend you should wait, Canon EOS R professional on its way and it will sure surprise us with its core specification.

Get Canon 1DX Mark III camera from Amazon.com | B&H Store

Get LIVE RUMORS –> FACEBOOK | TWITTER | INSTAGRAM to to get live news + Canon rumors 24X7

Canon 200D II / SL3 vs Canon 800D / T7i

By admin, on May 19th, 2019

Canon 200D II / SL3 vs Canon 800D / T7i – We have done a specification comparison review between these two camera. Let’s find out which is best for you.

Sensor and other specification

Imaging
Lens Mount	Canon EF-S	Canon EF-S
Camera Format	APS-C (1.6x Crop Factor)	APS-C (1.6x Crop Factor)
Pixels	Actual: 25.8 Megapixel Effective: 24.1 Megapixel	Actual: 25.8 Megapixel Effective: 24.2 Megapixel
Maximum Resolution	6000 x 4000	6000 x 4000
Aspect Ratio	1:1, 3:2, 4:3, 16:9	1:1, 3:2, 4:3, 16:9
Sensor Type	CMOS	CMOS
Sensor Size	22.3 x 14.9 mm	22.3 x 14.9 mm
Image File Format	JPEG, RAW	JPEG, RAW
Bit Depth	14-Bit	14-Bit
Image Stabilization	Digital, 5-Axis (Video Only)	Digital, 5-Axis (Video Only)

The sensor size, megapixels are almost same and even the ISO range of the camera is exactly same. Both sensor are using plain CMOS sensor tech, so more or less you will be getting same image quality from both the camera.

Exposure Modes, Metering Mode and Continuous shooting speed

ISO Sensitivity	Auto, 100 to 25600 (Extended: 100 to 51200)	Auto, 100 to 25600 (Extended: 100 to 51200)
Shutter Speed	Mechanical Shutter 1/4000 to 30 Second Bulb Mode	1/4000 to 30 Seconds Bulb Mode
Metering Method	Center-Weighted Average, Evaluative, Partial, Spot	Center-Weighted Average, Evaluative, Partial, Spot
Exposure Modes	Aperture Priority, Manual, Program, Shutter Priority	Aperture Priority, Manual, Program, Shutter Priority
Exposure Compensation	-5 to +5 EV (1/3, 1/2 EV Steps)	-5 to +5 EV (1/3, 1/2 EV Steps)
Metering Range	1 to 20 EV	1 to 20 EV
White Balance	Auto, Cloudy, Custom, Daylight, Flash, Fluorescent (White), Shade, Tungsten	Auto, Cloudy, Custom, Daylight, Flash, Fluorescent (White), Shade, Tungsten
Continuous Shooting	Up to 5 fps at 24.1 MP for Unlimited Exposures (JPEG) Up to 5 fps at 24.1 MP for up to 10 Exposures (Raw)	Up to 6 fps at 24.2 MP for up to 190 Exposures (JPEG) Up to 6 fps at 24.2 MP for up to 21 Exposures (Raw) Up to 3 fps at 24.2 MP for up to 190 Exposures (JPEG) Up to 3 fps at 24.2 MP for up to 21 Exposures (Raw)
Interval Recording	Yes	Yes
Self Timer	2/10-Second Delay	2/10-Second Delay

We have a lot of common specification between the two camera. As you can see in specification table the continuous shooting speed of the Canon T77 / 800D is 1 FPS more compared to Canon 200D but limited to 190 shots. With Canon 200D you are getting bit extra buffer and unlimited frames option till card is full.

Video mode Comparison – Canon 200D II / SL3 vs Canon 800D / T7i

Recording Modes	MP4/H.264 UHD 4K (3840 x 2160) at 23.976p/25p [120 Mb/s] Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 25p/29.97p/50p/59.94p [12 to 60 Mb/s] HD (1280 x 720) at 50p/59.94p [26 Mb/s]	MP4/H.264 Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 59.94p [60 Mb/s] Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 23.976p/29.97p [30 Mb/s] Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 29.97p [12 Mb/s] HD (1280 x 720) at 59.94p [26 Mb/s] HD (1280 x 720) at 29.97p [4 Mb/s] SD (640 x 480) at 29.97p [9 Mb/s] SD (640 x 480) at 29.97p [3 Mb/s] MOV/iFrame Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 29.97p [90 Mb/s]
External Recording Modes	4:2:2 10-Bit DCI 4K (4096 x 2160) at 23.976p/29.97p Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 59.94i/59.94p SD (640 x 480) at 59.94p
Recording Limit	Up to 29 Minutes, 59 Seconds	Up to 29 Minutes, 59 Seconds
Video Encoding	NTSC/PAL	NTSC/PAL
ISO Sensitivity	100 to 12800	Auto/Manual: 100 to 12800 (Extended: 25600)
Audio Recording	Built-In Microphone (Stereo) External Microphone Input (Stereo)	Built-In Microphone (Stereo) External Microphone Input

Canon 200D II / Canon SL3 camera features 4K video recording option and you can also record 10Bit videos via HDMI port.Canon 800D / T7i camera limited to full HD video recording mode only. However as we all know that the 4K video recording mode of Canon 800D / T7i is not so usable. Due to the crop and CDAF issue.

Canon 200D II / SL3 vs Canon 800D / T7i – Focus and other feature

Focus Type	Auto and Manual Focus	Auto and Manual Focus
Focus Mode	Continuous-Servo AF (C), Manual Focus (M), Single-Servo AF (S)	Automatic (A), Continuous-Servo AF (C), Manual Focus (M), Single-Servo AF (S)
Autofocus Points (Phase)	Phase Detection: 9 (9 Cross-Type)	Phase Detection: 45 (45 Cross-Type)
DPAF Points	3975 AF Points	-Unknown

Canon 200D II / SL3 feature revised sensor, the sensor is optimize to do more better AF performance compared to existing Canon SL2 / 200D camera. The total number of on sensor AF points are further divided 143 zones so users can select it easily without an issue.

Battery and Physical

Battery	1 x LP-E17 Rechargeable Lithium-Ion, 7.2 VDC, 1040 mAh (Approx. 1630 Shots)	1 x LP-E17 Rechargeable Lithium-Ion, 7.2 VDC, 1040 mAh
Dimensions (W x H x D)	4.82 x 3.65 x 2.75″ / 122.4 x 92.6 x 69.8 mm	5.2 x 3.9 x 3″ / 131 x 99.9 x 76.2 mm
Weight	15.84 oz / 449 g (Body with Battery and Memory)	1.17 lb / 532 g

Canon T7i camera features 820 shots per charge and with Canon 200D II / SL2 camera you can capture 1040 shots per charge. The 200D II is more light weight and bit small compared to 800D.

Verdict of Canon 200D II / SL3 vs Canon 800D / T7i:

Canon 200D II / SL3 camera is giving you next generation of DPAF system which will help you to get fast AF in still(Liveview) and video mode and a option to record 4K video with 10bit output . Not only that, you are also getting bit more battery life with light-weight body. We highly recommend you to go with Canon 200D II / SL3 camera.

Get Canon 800D / T7i camera from Amazon | B&H

Buy Canon 200D II / SL3 camera from B&H Store

Also see – Best Lenses for Canon 200D II / Canon SL3 / Canon 250D

Canon EOS RP vs Sony A7 II

By admin, on February 21st, 2019

We are doing a specification comparison review between Canon EOS RP vs Sony A7 II, to tell you the name of best camera in between the Canon EOS RP vs Sony A7 II

Price Difference between – Canon EOS RP vs Sony A7 II

Canon EOS RP	Sony A7 II
$1299 [Body Price] Amazon.com \| B&H	$998 [Body Price] Amazon.com \| B&H

Now its specification comparison time, we are comparing the specification of Canon EOS RP camera with with the Ultra Popular and still one of the best selling Fullframe Mirrorless camera the Sony A7 II.

So, let’s begin, take a look at the details in comparison sheet of both the camera. We are comparing every possible specification that may effect your choice of preference.

Camera Name	Canon EOS RP	Sony A7 II
Pixels	Actual: 27.1 Megapixel Effective: 26.2 Megapixel	Actual: 24.7 Megapixel Effective: 24.3 Megapixel
Tech	CMOS	Exmor CMOS
Aspect Ratio	3:2, 4:3, 16:9	3:2, 16:9
Sensor Size	35.9 x 24 mm	35.8 x 23.9 mm
File Formats	Still Images: JPEG, RAW Movies: AVC/H.264, MP4 Audio: AAC, Linear PCM	Still Images: JPEG, RAW Movies: AVCHD 2.0, XAVC S Audio: AAC LC, Dolby Digital 2ch, Linear PCM (Stereo)
Bit Depth	14-Bit	14-Bit
Dust Reduction System	Yes	Yes
Memory Card Type	SD SDHC SDXC	SDXC SDHC SD Memory Stick PRO Duo (High Speed) Memory Stick PRO HG-Duo Memory Stick XC-HG Duo
Image Stabilization	Digital, 5-Way	Sensor-Shift, 5-Way

As we all know that Canon EOS RP uses the same sensor as of Canon 6D Mark II camera. So, expecting a better dynamic range from Canon 6D Mark II as we have in Sony A7 II isn’t fair.

What actually improved from Canon 6D Mark II vs Sony A7 II ? By the Introduction of new DIGIC 8 image processor the Canon also implemented new noise processing algorithms with the camera. So, the noise of the camera is bit more controlled compared to Canon 6D Mark II.

Exposure and more…

Exposure Control
	Canon EOS RP	Sony A7 II
ISO Sensitivity	Auto, 100 to 40000 (Extended Mode:50 to 102400)	100 to 25600 (Extended Mode:50 to 25600)
Shutter	30 to 1/4000 Second , Bulb Mode	Type: Electronic & Mechanical Speed: 1/8000 to 30 Second , Bulb Mode
Exposure Modes	Modes: Aperture Priority, Manual, Program, Shutter Priority Metering Range: EV -3.0 to EV 20.0 Compensation: -3 EV to +3 EV (in 1/3, 1/2 EV Steps)	Modes: Aperture Priority, Auto, Manual, Programmed Auto, Scene Selection, Shutter Priority, Sweep Panorama Metering Range: EV -1.0 to EV 20.0 Compensation: -5 EV to +5 EV (in 1/3 or 1/2 EV Steps)
Buffer/Continuous Shooting	Up to 5 fps at 26.2 MP for Unlimited Frames in JPEG Format Up to 5 fps at 26.2 MP for up to 50 Frames in Raw Format	Up to 5 fps at 24 MP for up to 50 Frames

As you can see Canon EOS RP features extended ISO range compared to Sony A7 II Camera. Canon EOS RP features ISO range starting from 100-40,000 in standard Range and 50-102400 in Extended Range.

Whereas, Sony A7II camera features Standard ISO range from 100-25600 and you also have a option to push your ISO range to ISO 50.

In general more ISO range means better low-light performance. But with Sony A7 II camera you are also getting 5 axis Image stabilization system. So, when you are shooting in low light environment you can hit more lower shutter speed (upto 5 stop) when compared to Canon EOS RP camera.

One of the best thing is you don’t have to worry about a bit while using Prime lenses or third party lenses with your camera. Since, image stabilization will help you all the time despite of type of lenses you are using.

4K Video – Canon EOS RP vs Sony A7 III

AV Recording
Video Recording	Yes	Yes
Video Format	3840 x 2160p at 23.98/25 fps (MP4 via H.264) 1920 x 1080p at 25/29.97/50/59.94 fps (60 Mb/s MP4 via H.264) 1280 x 720p at 25/29.97/50/59.94 fps (12 Mb/s MP4 via H.264)	1920 x 1080p at 24/30/60 fps (50 Mb/s XAVC S) 1920 x 1080p at 60 fps (28 Mb/s AVCHD) 1920 x 1080i at 60 fps (24 Mb/s AVCHD) 1920 x 1080i at 60 fps (17 Mb/s AVCHD) 1920 x 1080p at 24 fps (24 Mb/s AVCHD) 1920 x 1080p at 24 fps (17 Mb/s AVCHD) 1440 x 1080 at 30 fps (12 Mb/s MP4) 640 x 480 at 30 fps (3 Mb/s MP4)
Output	MP4	MP4, XAVC S, S-Log2
Video Clip Length	Up to 29 Minute 59 Second	Up to 29 Minutes
Audio Recording	Built-In Mic: With Video (Stereo)	Built-In Mic: With Video (Stereo)

Canon EOS RP camera can record Videos in 4K whereas the Sony A7II camera limited to Full HD video recording mode only.

But Keep in Mind the Canon EOS RP Camera have some issues in 4K video recording mode

Limitations of Canon EOS RP in 4K Mode

Canon EOS RP uses the APS-C Portion of the sensor, so you will be getting very limited dynamic range
Canon EOS RP camera 4K video mode suffers from 1.6X Crop factor.
Canon EOS RP camera doesn’t have DPAF support when you are recording 4K videos.

Limitation of Canon EOS RP camera in Full HD Video Mode

In Canon EOS RP camera is missing 24p frame option in Full HD and HD recording mode.

Sony A7 II Camera doesn’t miss any standard recording option in Full HD video mode.

At the same time Sony A7 II camera 24 MP BSI CMOS Video Dynamic range is better compared to Canon EOS RP 26MP CMOS camera.

8Bit output with S-Log2 whereas Canon EOS RP has 8bit output without C-log.

DPAF vs HYBRID – Auto Focus

Focus Control
Focus Type	Auto & Manual Focus	Auto & Manual Focus
Continuous Focus	Continuous AF upto 3 FPS	Continuous AF upto 5 FPS
Autofocus Points	Phase Detection: 4779	Phase Detection: 117 Contrast Detection: 25

Canon clearly have a upper hand in the specs sheet while mentioning their EOS RP camera carry have more than 4K AF area zones or segments.

So, it’s very clear that Canon will have more AF screen coverage .

Fastest Camera – Canon EOS RP or Sony A7 II ?

Canon EOS RP camera fails to give Continuous AF support at 5FPS more, Continuous AF starts from 3 FPS and Subject tracking goes down upto 2.6 FPS.

Sony A7 II camera features Continuous shooting speed 5 FPS full time AF support and very accurate Eye AF support while recording videos.

Which one has better Display ?

Viewfinder/Display
Viewfinder Type	Electronic	Electronic
Viewfinder Size	0.39″	0.5″
Viewfinder Pixel Count	2,360,000	2,359,296
Viewfinder Eye Point	22.00 mm	27.00 mm
Viewfinder Coverage	100%	100%
Viewfinder Magnification	Approx. 0.70x	Approx. 0.71x
Diopter Adjustment	-4 to +1 m	-4 to +3 m
Display Screen	3″ Rear Screen Swivel Touchscreen LCD (1,040,000)	3″ Tilting LCD (1,228,800)
Screen Coverage	100%	100%

Canon EOS RP camera features better touch screen and viewfinder, compared to Sony A7II camera.

Other Features

Sony A7 II camera features better battery life (100+ shots), You will be also getting Environmental sealing with Sony A7 II camera. No weather sealing in Canon EOS RP.

Comparatively if we talk about list of lenses available, then we don’t have more than 10 lenses for Canon EOS RF Mount camera at the time I am writing this post. Whereas, Sony A7II camera have 100+ lenses out there specifically made for Sony FE Mount cameras.

Verdict:

For Hybrid Shooters we have no option other than Canon EOS RP, nature of display Canon EOS RP is more user friendly compared to Sony A7 II. For still shooters we recommend Sony A7 II camera, since the camera features better dynamic range, In-body 5 axis Image Stabilization system and better continuous drive.

Canon EOS RP $1299 [Body Price] Amazon.com | B&H

Sony A7 II $998 [Body Price] Amazon.com | B&H

New Camera Website, we list all type of new camera information, price review and all type camera rumors, subscribe us or follow us via twitter or facebook.

Disclaimer: We have attempted to select useful information to include on New Camera, and to ensure that the resources we have included on the site -- as well as the way we have described them -- are accurate, fair, and balanced. However, we make no claims, warranties, or other representations concerning the accuracy, completeness, or utility of the information provided, or concerning the abilities or performance of the organizations, agencies, companies, and other resources presented through New Camera

Copyright © 2024 NEW CAMERA - All Rights Reserved
Powered by WordPress & the Atahualpa Theme by BytesForAll. Discuss on our WP Forum

188 queries. 0.139 seconds.

NEW CAMERA VIDEOS ON YOUTUBE

Recent Posts