|
|||||
|
Download Our Android App
 |
Few More HIGH ISO Test images of Sony A7s surfaced over the web today, this time again the firmware remains same as previous test – version 0.01 (testing phase firmware), but the best part is we have many samples starting from ISO 1600 to ISO 409600.
The image slot of ISO 6400 is very neat and clean and no noise is visible… everything looks fine and perfect. Continue reading Sony A7s More HIGH ISO Test Images High ISO test of Nikon D610 and Canon 6D, both are entry level fullframe camera, Nikon D610 is Just announced by Nikon that replaces the faulty Nikon D600 camera, Canon 6D is over a year old.
Nikon D610 image look bit underexposed when compared to Canon 6D at same ISO level, the color noise level of Nikon D610 is bit high.
The JPEG output of Canon 6D is really very clean when you compare it with the Nikon D610 DSLR, the Canon 6D DIGIC 5+ Image Processor noise reduction algorithm works very effectively even at High ISO range. Also take a look at…. Canon 6D vs Nikon D610 at DxOMark Lab – The other most important thing is the Canon 6D score is lower than Nikon D610 according to DxO,
The DxOMark have generally gives low score to Canon cameras and I don’t know the real reason behind that, but let’s assume that even if a camera giving cleaner JPEG only (that’s DxO says about Canon camera) compared to its competitor then they should include a different Column in the table that will show the JEPG / RAW test score separately. Buy Canon 6D at Amazon || Nikon D610 at Amazon Image Credit: dkamera.de Nikon D3300 vs Canon 700D / T5i High ISO test images, Nikon D3300 have bit more details and less noise compared to Canon 700D / T5i, since Nikon removed the low pass filter we can clearly see improvement in the image sensor performance
Continue reading Nikon D3300 vs Canon 700D / T5i Nikon D4s High ISO test images now surfaced over the web, the D4s supports High ISO upto 409600 and features newly developed sensor with Expeed 4 image processor which is approx 30% faster than the previous Expeed 3 processor
Does Nikon D4s images look bit soft at 100% when compared to Nikon D4 at lower ISO range. I really appreciate the effort made by Nikon to boost the ISO range to a next level, but when I see at comparison images taken at ISO 1600, the Nikon D4s noise reduction filter look bit strong compared to Nikon D4 DSLR filter, and as a result we can clearly see less noise + bit less details in the image samples. The Nikon D4s images look bit softer than the Nikon D4 images.
As we can see the effect of strong NR filter / new sensor / new image processor the image of Nikon D4s have less color noise in it. more images available here – bit.ly/NxeMfq We have already done a specification comparison review between these camera, now its time for HIGH ISO TEST, take a look below
Also see specification comparison review here Buy Sony RX10 from Amazon || Buy Sony RX100 M2 from Amazon image credit -imagine resource We have arranged some HIGH ISO samples of all the flagship full-frame DSLR, as we all know that Nikon D4 and DF shares same sensor so the overall image quality of both the camera is almost same, but at ISO 51200 the Nikon DF image is showing bit more color noise compared to D4. Canon 1DX is also showing very good image quality during HIGH ISO test.
focus-numerique just published the HIGH ISO test images of Nikon DF DSLR, the Nikon DF image quality is superb between 50 to 1600, usable upto 12800 and the images after 25600 showing significant amount noise. Shot settings – scene is illuminated at 200 lux, the Nikon Df is equipped with 50 mm f / 1.8, Aperture at f / 5.6, ISO – variable
you can download RAW files from focus-numerique |
       KEEP THIS BLOG ALIVE - Support New Camera
Buy Canon Lenses, Buy Music CD or Digital Camera at amazon it helps this site, and you do not pay anything extra, it is just a way to help support this site. 
  |
|||
|
New Camera Website, we list all type of new camera information, price review and all type camera rumors, subscribe us or follow us via twitter or facebook. 185 queries. 0.089 seconds. |
|||||
