Enter your E-Mail and Click on Submit Button to get New Camera Information directly to your E-Mail Inbox

Delivered by FeedBurner

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER Follow us on Twitter
NEW CAMERA LINKS
NEWS News about new camera
Hot at New Camera Hot Picks by New Camera

Camera Rumors List of all latest Camera Rumors on Web.
Canon Rumors Latest Canon Rumors.
Nikon Rumors Latest Nikon Rumors.
Sony Rumors Latest Sony Rumors.

Sample Images Click here to see New Camera Sample Images.
Sample Video Click here to see New Camera Sample Video.
Firmware Update

Nikon D610 vs Nikon D600

Nikon-D610-vs-Nikon-D600-2
Nikon D610 announced few days ago, As we have said earlier there are no major difference between these camera, take a look below at specification comparison table,

Nikon-D610-vs-Nikon-D600

As you can see there is no major difference between these two camera, both shares same core specification and body design.

Nikon-D610-vs-Nikon-D600-3

After a quick research and reading detailed specification + press release of both the camera we found that…
1. Oil issue solved
2. New “Quiet continuous” mode is introduced – After activating the silent continuous shooting mode you can capture 3 fps with limited mechanical noise.
3. Improved white balance with D610

Verdict: New users should buy Nikon D610 camera but we never recommend D600 users to spend $2K and buy the same camera, D600 users should wait for D620 (OR D610 successor).

Body Only – $1999.95 Amazon | B&H

1 comment to Nikon D610 vs Nikon D600

  • I think this is a bit of a con job from Nikon. They should have repaired all the D600′s that had the oil issue. Then brought out a replacement for the D700 (of which I have 2). I really wanted a new camera that sat in between the D600 and D800. I would love to have a quiet mode as the D700 is very noisy especially when trying to shoot a wedding in a quiet church !!! This is a bad PR move by Nikon. Tony.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


8 + six =